Penn State Cult (Joe Knew)

[Zurp]

First, the "study" was just me copying and pasting the numbers I found on the internet into an excel sheet, and then separating them into columns for "in Columbus" and "in the erector set". Night games might be another way to look into it.

The reason it was at noon is because the Big Ten wanted to piss off the cult. Ha. At least, that's what the cult wants us to believe. In all actuality, Fox picked up the game early in the year. The game was to be on October 29, which they all knew would be during the World Series. I don't know how the World Series television contract works/worked, but we also knew that Fox would have the World Series game that night. So.... Fox chose to put Ohio State - Penn State on at noon.

I enjoy watching that cult cry about stuff, so I enjoyed them crying, saying that they should be allowed to dictate when the game was, not Fox. (Their argument was that since The Game is always at noon, they should be allowed to choose their white-out games. I wanted to see Ohio State show up on time and let Fox televise their work-out. Penn State can show up at 8:00 and be told that they already forfeited. That would be funny.

Follow-up.
So, according to Wikipedia, Penn State has been doing their awesome white-out since 2004. In that time, they are 2-3 against Ohio State during white-out games, for an average score of 22.8-24.8. Outside of the white-out games, they are 0-4 against Ohio State at home in that time frame with an average score of 20.0-35.8.

Does that mean that the white-out caused the closer games? Maybe. But I think we need to look at the games, and maybe take a deeper dive into the statistics, DBB-style, and I'm not going to get that deep.

 

[BuckeyeNation27]

Follow-up.
So, according to Wikipedia, Penn State has been doing their awesome white-out since 2004. In that time, they are 2-3 against Ohio State during white-out games, for an average score of 22.8-24.8. Outside of the white-out games, they are 0-4 against Ohio State at home in that time frame with an average score of 20.0-35.8.

Does that mean that the white-out caused the closer games? Maybe. But I think we need to look at the games, and maybe take a deeper dive into the statistics, DBB-style, and I'm not going to get that deep.

if we just win in 2005 like we were supposed to, white out games aren't even a thing. fuck the cult.

 

[Zurp]

OT - 9 year old PA kid graduates from high school

Bucks County boy graduates high school at 9 and is member of MENSA (sorry if below pastes funny using my phone) 9-year-old boy graduates from Harrisburg-based high school Updated: 6:52 PM EST Feb 3, 2023 Barbara Barr Reporter High school graduation is always a special time in a...

pennstate.forums.rivals.com

So... some 9-year-old graduates high school. I've got opinions of that, but that's not why I posted it here. They start talking about what he's going to do next.

Some troll comes in and hits a home run. The home run has since been deleted, but the reactions to it have saved it. And they're all pretty angry. Ha.







Stop being offended by the trolls and the trolls go away.

 

[CMic]

OT - 9 year old PA kid graduates from high school

Bucks County boy graduates high school at 9 and is member of MENSA (sorry if below pastes funny using my phone) 9-year-old boy graduates from Harrisburg-based high school Updated: 6:52 PM EST Feb 3, 2023 Barbara Barr Reporter High school graduation is always a special time in a...

pennstate.forums.rivals.com

So... some 9-year-old graduates high school. I've got opinions of that, but that's not why I posted it here. They start talking about what he's going to do next.

Some troll comes in and hits a home run. The home run has since been deleted, but the reactions to it have saved it. And they're all pretty angry. Ha.

View attachment 34475

View attachment 34476

View attachment 34477

Stop being offended by the trolls and the trolls go away.

 

[Zurp]

Eagles fans. Many are Penn State fans, so I figure I can put this here.

Tough loss for the Eagles

Not a fan of that holding call at the end. Ticky tack call to me.

pennstate.forums.rivals.com

Typical "blame it on the refs, the field, everything but ourselves" mentality.

Post #19 is a twitter video of a guy breaking a TV when the Chiefs made that field goal.

 

[BuckeyeNation27]

That call was bad, and that video is fake.

 

[LovelandBuckeye]

That call was bad, and that video is fake.

Almost like we have seen that call 2 years in a row now.

 

[Bestbuck36]

LOL, of course the field was shit. It's always shit out here but both teams played the same field dipshits. I didnt like the call either but it wasn't stopping that FG. Would the Eagles have tied it up or a miracle, who knows, but odds are the game ended with the correct winner.

 

[Zurp]

The victory that we have being paying for ever since...

and probably cost us a national championship.

pennstate.forums.rivals.com

Cultists believe that Penn State's win over Ohio State in 1994 is why they didn't win the national championship that year, and that they've been paying the price for it ever since.

Classic cultist belief. Because of that game, the Big Ten punished Penn State by dropping them to #2. Then, they were unable to play for a national championship and Nebraska won it. They don't understand that the Big Ten had 0 votes in the AP poll. The Big Ten coaches probably had some of the votes in the coaches' poll, but they don't cry about that one, for some reason. They only complain about the AP poll. Anyway, they whine because the "Big Ten voters" didn't vote them #1. Some believe it is because Joesus was too good of a person (can you really call him a "man"? I mean, he's certainly above all other humans, right?) and they only beat Indiana by a little bit. Joesus refused to run the score up on other teams. Others believe it was because they embarrassed Ohio State. (Oddly enough, when they beat Ohio State 63-14, it was not "running up the score", but when Ohio State beat Penn State, it was "running up the score".) The Big Ten punished Penn State for beating down their favorite son by dropping them to #2. And Penn State had no other chance to jump up to #1. What they don't want to remember is that the majority of their #1 votes were from voters within "Big Ten territory", and even if they got 100% of those votes, they still wouldn't have been #1.

As to whether this is the reason the conference (and therefore the referees) hate them, that's a new one to me. I'd always heard they weren't wanted at the beginning. (Blah blah blah, something about how they accepted their invitation in about 1990, but the Big Ten made them sit out until 1993.)

Anyway, see if this thread gets more fun today and tomorrow..

 

[BuckeyeNation27]

If anybody was the Big Ten's favorite in the 90s......it wasn't us.

 

[gmen6981]

The victory that we have being paying for ever since...

and probably cost us a national championship.

pennstate.forums.rivals.com

Cultists believe that Penn State's win over Ohio State in 1994 is why they didn't win the national championship that year, and that they've been paying the price for it ever since.

Classic cultist belief. Because of that game, the Big Ten punished Penn State by dropping them to #2. Then, they were unable to play for a national championship and Nebraska won it. They don't understand that the Big Ten had 0 votes in the AP poll. The Big Ten coaches probably had some of the votes in the coaches' poll, but they don't cry about that one, for some reason. They only complain about the AP poll. Anyway, they whine because the "Big Ten voters" didn't vote them #1. Some believe it is because Joesus was too good of a person (can you really call him a "man"? I mean, he's certainly above all other humans, right?) and they only beat Indiana by a little bit. Joesus refused to run the score up on other teams. Others believe it was because they embarrassed Ohio State. (Oddly enough, when they beat Ohio State 63-14, it was not "running up the score", but when Ohio State beat Penn State, it was "running up the score".) The Big Ten punished Penn State for beating down their favorite son by dropping them to #2. And Penn State had no other chance to jump up to #1. What they don't want to remember is that the majority of their #1 votes were from voters within "Big Ten territory", and even if they got 100% of those votes, they still wouldn't have been #1.

As to whether this is the reason the conference (and therefore the referees) hate them, that's a new one to me. I'd always heard they weren't wanted at the beginning. (Blah blah blah, something about how they accepted their invitation in about 1990, but the Big Ten made them sit out until 1993.)

Anyway, see if this thread gets more fun today and tomorrow..

They also firmly believe that their game against scUM in 2005 was stolen from them because LLLLLLLoyd Carr got two seconds added to the clock ( even though "His Holiness St Joe" did the same thing earlier in the game) and the infamous "heel-toe" catch ruling. That loss ( according to them) kept them from knocking Texas out of the #2 spot and playing for a Natty. They just can't accept that there is no way in my blue heaven that even an undefeated PSU was going to move into the #2 spot. USC and Texas went wire to wire as 1 & 2 and 2005 was one of the few years the BCS actually got it right.

 

[3074326]

They also firmly believe that their game against scUM in 2005 was stolen from them because LLLLLLLoyd Carr got two seconds added to the clock ( even though "His Holiness St Joe" did the same thing earlier in the game) and the infamous "heel-toe" catch ruling. That loss ( according to them) kept them from knocking Texas out of the #2 spot and playing for a Natty. They just can't accept that there is no way in my blue heaven that even an undefeated PSU was going to move into the #2 spot. USC and Texas went wire to wire as 1 & 2 and 2005 was one of the few years the BCS actually got it right.

I’m glad they feel they were robbed. Probably hurts more. Fuck em

 

[Zurp]

They also firmly believe that their game against scUM in 2005 was stolen from them because LLLLLLLoyd Carr got two seconds added to the clock ( even though "His Holiness St Joe" did the same thing earlier in the game) and the infamous "heel-toe" catch ruling. That loss ( according to them) kept them from knocking Texas out of the #2 spot and playing for a Natty. They just can't accept that there is no way in my blue heaven that even an undefeated PSU was going to move into the #2 spot. USC and Texas went wire to wire as 1 & 2 and 2005 was one of the few years the BCS actually got it right.

The 2 seconds that Joesus got are irrelevant. I don't know whether they should or shouldn't have gotten the 2 seconds. I don't even know the play. But yes, Lloyd got 2 seconds added on the clock. A receiver was tackled in bounds with 31 seconds. The ref signaled "keep the clock running." The initial ruling was that the timeout was awarded with 29 seconds left. Then they added 2 seconds back to the 31 seconds. I didn't watch the game live, but I remember seeing a video that showed that the 31 seconds was correct. I can't seem to find it now. So, take it as you want - 31 seconds or 29 seconds.

The heel-toe catch is much goofier. It was right before or right after the 31 seconds. It wasn't a huge gain, and wouldn't have been make-or-break for either team. But it's goofy. Receiver caught the ball in the air, brought his foot down, picked it back up, and then fell out of bounds. The official ruling was that his toes came down in bounds without his heel coming down. He picked his foot up (heel still not coming down) and then landed out of bounds. To me, I'd say his heel hit before he picked it up. But it's goofy that that play was never reviewed. I'm definitely not a conspiracy theorist or a cult defender, but I believe that the referees were wrong on that play. I don't think it was intentional.

Regardless, the play is over. The game is over. Whether Penn State won is irrelevant to how that season went on. Penn State would not have passed Texas or USC. Penn State went on to barely beat 8-4 Florida State. Did they need overtime to win it? I forget.

 

[LovelandBuckeye]

Did they need overtime to win it?

Fuck 'em!

 

[Zurp]

Same thread.

They definitely didn’t like that beat down, and the league absolutely didn’t want Penn State supplanting the “Big Two” so quickly. —Explains why the Midwest writers and coaches tossed Penn State under the bus with the year end polls. If Penn State were able to recruit with a National Championship right out of the gate, the “Big Two” would have been immediately subjugated . ——Passive aggressive , administrative beat down of the “New Guy”.
** Michigan blowing that game against Colorado also contributed.**

Oh boy, did that piss them off. When we joined this bogus B2G conference all the talk was Penn State was going to learn what real football is about. That the weekly pounding of the big boys would show them interlopers from back east. It would take five years or more for them to adapt.

Then, in just the second year, we not only win the conference but steam roll right through everyone. Really made them look bad. And they have hated us ever since.

Funny... yeah, they came in and rolled through the conference in the 2nd year. What about since? In 30 years, how many conference titles did they get? 1994, 2005, 2008, 2016. Am I missing one? I thought they had 5 championships. Wikipedia says it's just the 4 Big Ten titles. So... yeah, they've really made the conference look bad.

*ichigan has 6 championships in that time.
Wisconsin has 5 championships in that time.
Ohio State, of course, has a bunch.
Northwestern has 3 championships and Michigan State has 3. So, good work being 4th place, above Northwestern.