-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter mercer_buckeye
- Start date
LovelandBuckeye
You never lose to those pricks. Ever. Ever. - UFM
Especially when they use...wait for it...ah, nevermind. You know what I was going to dildo.
Upvote
0
Penn State Professor tells students to ‘watch gay or lesbian porn’ to learn how to be ‘bisexual’
Penn State professor Sam Richards challenged straight students in his sociology class to watch gay or lesbian porn to discover a new side to their sexuality.
“If you’re straight, watch gay or lesbian porn and see how quickly you feel aroused. And how you can’t control that. You’ll realize that, ‘Oh, d—, I could be sexualized by people who are like me.’”
“We are all at some level nonbinary,” Richards said, summing up the views of certain “sociologists.” “We’re all, very much, easily bisexual.”
The class was largely silent in response.
Entire article: https://nypost.com/2023/01/12/penn-state-professor-sam-richards-tells-students-to-watch-porn/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-students-sociology-class-watch-gay-porn.html
Penn State → Ped State → (Gay) Porn State
63 year old creep telling children to watch porn and get back to him? Yeah, nothing to see here.
Upvote
0
Sounds about right.Penn State Professor tells students to ‘watch gay or lesbian porn’ to learn how to be ‘bisexual’
Penn State professor Sam Richards challenged straight students in his sociology class to watch gay or lesbian porn to discover a new side to their sexuality.
“If you’re straight, watch gay or lesbian porn and see how quickly you feel aroused. And how you can’t control that. You’ll realize that, ‘Oh, d—, I could be sexualized by people who are like me.’”
“We are all at some level nonbinary,” Richards said, summing up the views of certain “sociologists.” “We’re all, very much, easily bisexual.”
The class was largely silent in response.
.
.
.
The class, SOC 119, was held on Dec. 6 2022, according to Richards’ YouTube channel.
The topic of the day was “A Conversation on Trans Issues, TERFS, and The Binary.” TERF is an acronym for “trans-exclusionary radical feminist.”
During the same class that Prof. Richards recommended his students watch gay and lesbian porn, he also told a story about a student that transitioned to a different gender and gave advice to female students about how to urinate standing up...
“Women, you should know this by the way, the little trick, you can have a little piece of leather and fold it up and use that to go in the urinal or go outside.”
Entire article: https://nypost.com/2023/01/12/penn-state-professor-sam-richards-tells-students-to-watch-porn/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-students-sociology-class-watch-gay-porn.html
Penn State → Ped State → (Gay) Porn State
Upvote
0
LovelandBuckeye
You never lose to those pricks. Ever. Ever. - UFM
I agree that he is 100% a creep but these are college students not children so to speak. I say this because they can vote and go to war...but they also can't but smokes or beers so I don't know anymore.
Upvote
0
Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
They're also a captive audience. He may not have locked the doors, but we've been conditioned all of our lives in class to believe that we need to pay attention to the instructor and do what he/she says.
This is a sociology class. Did it have anything to do with same-sex "relations"? If so, then maybe this isn't so bad.
But I get the feeling that this professor was trying to make a point that didn't match his class.
Upvote
0
LovelandBuckeye
You never lose to those pricks. Ever. Ever. - UFM
I agree. I took a class at night called Society & Business. The professor was a stereotype of 1990s butch lesbian. All of the adults played the game and never challenged anything she said. I did in the beginning as I was the only college aged student in this class. An lady in her 30s pulled me aside and schooled me up. On my final paper I stated in my last paragraph that I did not agree with most of what she taught but I need a C on this paper to pass her class.
I got a C.
Cool story bro. I know. But she definitely had me listening to every word of hers but it was so I could find holes in her thinking. I can definitely see how it could go the other way though.
Upvote
0
You guys paid attention to teachers? I paid attention to my 8th grade math teachers tits, but that's about it.
Upvote
0
Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
Your story is better than mine.
I had to take an English class freshman year. Supposedly everyone did. So the first day, 200 of us were sitting in the auditorium, and they tell us that we're supposed to split into smaller classes - about 10-15 per class. The classes would be taught by graduate students. Each would have its own theme. So a buddy and I looked over the choices, and he convinced me to sign up for some "women empowerment" or something like that. "There's going to be all the hot chicks in here." "Oohh - good point." It turned into a class where we read poetry and short stories and shit by women about how men were evil. We even watched Thelma and Louise in class. My final paper was about the Navajo tribes and about how the women are the ones who own all the property. (I don't remember if I pulled it out of my ass or if I really did the research.) I probably got a C.
I didn't have any teachers like that.
My kids have each had teachers like that. I'm always there for the parent/teacher conferences.
Upvote
0
ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
This article ↑ losses all credibility when Ped State isn't even listed.
Upvote
0
TenYearBore
Still angry at Chic Harley
This article ↑ losses all credibility when Ped State isn't even listed.
Sparty is on this list but my Wolverine aren't? Preposterous; I demand a recount!
Wait...
Upvote
0
Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
Best Home Game Atmosphere/Advantage
Tier 1 Texas Aggie PSU LSU Clempson Tier 2 Oregon Ohio State Tennessee Bama Nebraska Aubourbon Florida Georgia FSU ND Wisconsin
pennstate.forums.rivals.com
I have to assume that the OP decided to rank a bunch of stadiums based on their gameday atmosphere. He just ranks them "Tier 1" and "Tier 2". 4 teams in Tier 1, and 13 in Tier 2. Of course, he puts Penn State in Tier 1 and Ohio State in Tier 2. No surprise.
But let's follow this out and see what the guy is saying. Since and including 2001, Ohio State is 17-5 against Penn State, with an average score of 28.9-18.9. In Columbus, Ohio State is 9-2, with an average score of 29.2-15.7. In Happy Valley, Ohio State is 8-3, with an average score of 28.6-22.1
The average score is about 2 touchdown victory for Ohio State in Columbus. If this guy is right, this score should be closer to a neutral field result than playing at Penn State, where the average score is just under a 1 touchdown victory for Ohio State. So he's saying that their "success" against Ohio State (averaging a 10-point loss, annually) is skewed by the awesomeness of their stadium. Should it normally be 12 points? I mean, for a fanbase that constantly shouts, "We're cool! We're elite!!" stating that your success comes from your stadium is a good way to get laughed at.
Also, I was surprised to see that Ohio State only averages about 0.6 points more in Columbus than in Happy Valley. Since the crowd usually doesn't affect the home team's offense, but probably just the visiting team's offense, I'd say that your stadium doesn't do shit to Ohio State. On the other hand, Ohio State's crowd seems to affect Penn State's offense by about 1 touchdown per game. Of course, this is calling all scores "Offensive Scores", and not taking defensive or special teams scores into consideration.
Upvote
0
BigWoof31
"Barkin' up the wrong tree"
Best Home Game Atmosphere/Advantage
Tier 1 Texas Aggie PSU LSU Clempson Tier 2 Oregon Ohio State Tennessee Bama Nebraska Aubourbon Florida Georgia FSU ND Wisconsin
I have to assume that the OP decided to rank a bunch of stadiums based on their gameday atmosphere. He just ranks them "Tier 1" and "Tier 2". 4 teams in Tier 1, and 13 in Tier 2. Of course, he puts Penn State in Tier 1 and Ohio State in Tier 2. No surprise.
But let's follow this out and see what the guy is saying. Since and including 2001, Ohio State is 17-5 against Penn State, with an average score of 28.9-18.9. In Columbus, Ohio State is 9-2, with an average score of 29.2-15.7. In Happy Valley, Ohio State is 8-3, with an average score of 28.6-22.1
The average score is about 2 touchdown victory for Ohio State in Columbus. If this guy is right, this score should be closer to a neutral field result than playing at Penn State, where the average score is just under a 1 touchdown victory for Ohio State. So he's saying that their "success" against Ohio State (averaging a 10-point loss, annually) is skewed by the awesomeness of their stadium. Should it normally be 12 points? I mean, for a fanbase that constantly shouts, "We're cool! We're elite!!" stating that your success comes from your stadium is a good way to get laughed at.
Also, I was surprised to see that Ohio State only averages about 0.6 points more in Columbus than in Happy Valley. Since the crowd usually doesn't affect the home team's offense, but probably just the visiting team's offense, I'd say that your stadium doesn't do shit to Ohio State. On the other hand, Ohio State's crowd seems to affect Penn State's offense by about 1 touchdown per game. Of course, this is calling all scores "Offensive Scores", and not taking defensive or special teams scores into consideration.
Surprised that this particular study doesn't take into account the value of night games vs. day games.
This past season, I was stunned the game at PSU was a nooner. Usually every opportunity to schedule OSU at night is taken when the game is at Penn State. I would give greater credence to his numbers if night games were taken into account as I believe the crowd/awesome stadium plays a greater factor in the evening than a sleepy noon-kickoff.
Just my $.02
Upvote
0
Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
First, the "study" was just me copying and pasting the numbers I found on the internet into an excel sheet, and then separating them into columns for "in Columbus" and "in the erector set". Night games might be another way to look into it.
The reason it was at noon is because the Big Ten wanted to piss off the cult. Ha. At least, that's what the cult wants us to believe. In all actuality, Fox picked up the game early in the year. The game was to be on October 29, which they all knew would be during the World Series. I don't know how the World Series television contract works/worked, but we also knew that Fox would have the World Series game that night. So.... Fox chose to put Ohio State - Penn State on at noon.
I enjoy watching that cult cry about stuff, so I enjoyed them crying, saying that they should be allowed to dictate when the game was, not Fox. (Their argument was that since The Game is always at noon, they should be allowed to choose their white-out games. I wanted to see Ohio State show up on time and let Fox televise their work-out. Penn State can show up at 8:00 and be told that they already forfeited. That would be funny.
Upvote
0