Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/fc-espn-takes-on-penn-state-once-again.317543/page-17
That thread is like a train wreck. I can't stop watching it.
It's up to 17 pages now, and PSU2UNC is winning the internet. He's arguing with WHCANole, who seems to make some sense. But PSU2UNC has decided to double-down on Sandusky's innocence.
If Jerry didn't do anything wrong, then Joe didn't cover anything up, and the whole world will praise us for being as awesome as we know we are.
Even for the cult, this is pretty amazing shit.
Ten years later, and the freaks are still at it, and Spanier (if that email is real) is a real piece of shit. Well, he is even if the email is a fantasy.
I haven't perused that thread yet, but it sounds identical to this (now-deleted) thread that ORD cited several months ago where one of those whackos sent an email to Spanier:
There were other Pedsters in that thread on PSU2UNC's side (can' remember many of their usernames except for some guy "francofan"), but that WHCANole poster was the main one arguing with the cult. It went on for 60-70 pages before they deleted it.
Even some of the other Ped State posters on that forum were commenting about how embarrassing that thread was, which is probably why they deleted it.
You know me - I'll never give up a chance to make fun of the cult.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/the-story-on-how-mcsorley-almost-didnt-go-to-psu.318453/
"Yay - McSorley chose us over everyone else! We're so great."
"No, McSorley wasn't that good."
"Kill the imposter!!!" Is there a gif of Donald Sutherland screaming at the end of Body Snatchers?
I'm not going to speak for how McSorley did for most of his time at Penn State. But he lost them 2 games against Ohio State. Go watch the end of 2017 game. Never mind - I'll do it for you:
2:07:10 in the video. 8:15 to go in the game, Penn State is winning 35-27. With the ball with First and Goal at the 7. A touchdown makes it a 15-point game. Not insurmountable, but remember that Ohio State only scored 12 points to win, after keeping Penn State to a field goal, making it an 11-point game.
First Down - McSorley keeps on what appears to me to be a read-option play. He gets 3 yards. I'm not sure if Barkley would have gotten around the end, but all of the Ohio State players were accounted for. Also, to his credit, Barkley didn't do much in the second half, so maybe keeping it was the right call.
Second and Four - Another apparent read option. This time, it looks as though a linebacker is on Barkley. He really just gets back to the line of scrimmage, though, with Bosa all over him. I have to believe Barkley would have gotten more yards than McSorley did.
Third down - Not wanting to be the guy who kept it 3 times and didn't score, he hands off to Barkley. Loss of 2 yards. Does McSorley get around the edge, if he keeps it? Maybe.
Go back to first down, and trade quarterbacks. No way in hell does Ohio State stop Barrett from scoring, and no way in hell does McSorley lead the Buckeyes to 15 points with 6:30 remaining.
Let's not forget THIS brilliant decision on4th and 5 that cost them the game the following year.
Go to 16:57, Franklin is asked about a school reportedly getting $13M a year NIL money:
He was adamant that Penn State must do everything it can to be at the forefront on NIL. Some folks on hand seemed to think the numbers being thrown around are too big. Franklin would not let it go — and I don't blame him. He was not angry. Just wanted to be sure he made his point.
Still not elite.He has a valid point and reason to be frustrated if his boosters/collectives won't pony up the proper amount, whether that's the $13m Day said or not. But with Day putting a number out there, he now put ALL collectives on notice what to produce... For now.
It's going to be shitty if these coaches can't bring in top talent due to their own collectives not raising enough funds, and it will cause some to lose jobs. And the funding is out of their hands
Could it be that covering up for child molesters tends to devalue NIL opportunities for the players? I know I wouldn't want to associate my brand with Penn State. If universities want to maximize NIL, they better keep a clean image.
Are NIL sponsors associating more with the school/team or with the players? I mean.. yeah, this Columbus-based company is going to sign an Ohio State player to some contract, and that's cool. And if that player doesn't sign with Ohio State, some other player will get that contract. So, in that sense, they're associating more with the team. But if Ohio State had some scandal giving them a black eye, don't you think that same company would still want an Ohio State player to endorse them? As long as Ohio State has fans, the players will have fans. Same goes for Penn State. Those weirdos think the whole country loves them - or SHOULD love them. But they still have a lot of fans. And they've rationalized their black eye to the point that they think it isn't even black. Those fans will support the players and support any cause or company that the players endorse.
I'm definitely not a marketing expert, but I have to think the image of both the school and the player would affect the value of at least some NIL agreements. I'm sure there will be boosters who just view NIL as a way to help the program land recruits and that don't care if they receive a financial benefit. But I have to think that some companies are actually expecting to get a return on their investment in the form of increased sales. I suppose it depends on where the NIL money is coming from. I would think any large corporate sponsorships (think State Farm's sponsorship of Aaron Rodgers or Patrick Mahomes) would look for programs and players with a good national image.
Do players like him even have to attend class anymore? As I've said before, why not just dispense with the pretense, and consider players like him as employees of the school rather than student-athletes, which we all know they aren't.
The questions that are looming and what does bother many of us is: are they going to college and heading toward a degree? If not, should they even be in college? That is what is purported to be on the field and noted as peers of the student sections. College athletics is very definitely socialistic: the revenue sports support the non-revenue sports which are pretty much everything else (we all know the handful of the revenue sports). What happens to these, are they and can they be sacrificed over escalating costs at the revenue teams? I certainly don’t want those kids losing their dreams. If it becomes an employee scenario, does that even make sense for a college sport. Like it or not, it is college.