cincibuck
You kids stay off my lawn!
It was during the summer of 2010 when the "tatgate" events took place. When Tress lied, it was on the statement every team sends to the NCAA saying they were not aware of any violations. That statement was sent before the beginning of the 2010 season. The Bucks played the 2010 season with players who should not have been eligible. It was AFTER the 2010 regular season, and before the Bowl Game when everything came to light. Tress was fired in the spring of 2011 ( he actually coached the 2011 spring game). Braxton committed in the summer of 2010, BEFORE the season began but didn't enter school until the following year. When everything happened and Tress lied to the NCAA, he was already aware that Braxton would be there for the 2011 season. At the same time, if the "scandal" didn't happen, Pryor would have been the QB in 2011. The question posed is whether the knowledge of Pryor's involvement and the fact that Miller would be there in 2011 affected Tress's decision making. Just remember, although the Bucks were penalized because of the 2010 season after the fact ( when Miller was still in High School but already committed to OSU) nothing became public until AFTER the season. In other words, when Tressel lied to the NCAA prior to the 2010 season, Tress knew Braxton was already committed and would be there for 2011 if Pryor got caught up in the scandal.
Agree, agree. But to suggest that ANY coach (possible exception being Hairball) doesn't look at the next year's talent even during the current season seems to me to be inaccurate. I forgot Guiton, but again we're looking at a drop off in talent going from Pryor to Bauserman, Guiton, and an unknown freshman.
Upvote
0