• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Penn State Cult (Joe Knew)

IT WAS AN IMPACTFUL NON-CALL!

HOLDING!

Goes back to JoePed's hand picked home ref crews. According to Pitt fans old enough to remember, whenever a visiting team in the erector set would start to put together a drive that threatened a Ped State win, they'd be hit with several phantom holding calls. That's why the pedsters are like Pavlov's dog in expecting holding calls whenever an opponent starts to move the ball well.
 
Upvote 0
oh and you are a facist if you dont praise him.

Oh, well then...in that case, sign me the hell right up.

ADOLPH20JOE20KNEW20final.jpg
 
Upvote 0
More lolz from BWI

We've seen the "game-changers" time and time again during the last 20 years in this conference -- the vast majority, if not all, going against PSU and in favor of OSU/Michigan. These have been well-documented. The votes against PSU's membership in the conference are also well documented. At the time there was fear that PSU would dominate based on what had occurred going back to 1978. Those fears materialized in 1994. Since then we've seen so much nonsense that it precipitated instant replay. Then the conference had the balls to thwart even instant replay. One must have their head in the sand not to recognize all of this for what it is.

So after 1994 the Big Ten was like oh shit we better get our refs to start fucking these guys left and right so they dont dominate!

along with a great "film review' of a offsides call that had absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of the game (Ped State already getting boatraced at the time) with a great closing argument

Those are the FACTS of the still frames in question - facts that you can't refute jack@ss

FACTS but no EVIDENTS? no wonder they are confused.
 
Upvote 0
http://www.collegian.psu.edu/opinion/columnists/article_18a03f7c-7e11-11e6-a92a-a7a09cbb84c2.html

The comments at the bottom are worth it. The mutants weren't happy....I hope these professors/lecturers/etc have taken the necessary protective measures....
My personal favorite:


Linda Rauch Berkland
·
Works at Registered Dietitian
Sean Kearney news flash: threats from someone behind a keyboard and screen are not "facing retaliation".

Yep. If I was to say, send a threatening email to the President or Governor or Mayor, there is NO WAY I'd be prosecuted. I'd just be a blowhard behind a keyboard!

Dumb twat.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top