• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Penn State Cult (Joe Knew)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
The threads about "How to educate non-believers in Joesus" are always entertaining. These types of answers are my favorite.

Here is what I do (and frankly, I don't get into discussions with people about this all that often)

I say - "Tell me three things you know to be irrefutable facts about the issue. And then, let me respond to them. And after that, tell me three more things you know to be irrefutable facts about the issue. And then, I will respond to those three. And we will keep going from there".

They rarely make it past the second "irrefutable fact" of the first three issues. And if they do, it morphs into conjecture and speculation, and they typically just walk away. In a huff
Click to expand...

If you're asking someone for "Three non refutable facts" that Joe knew......you best better have three non refutable facts of your own that he didn't. Which they don't.
 
Upvote 0
yea.... Rutgers would walk away from BigTen money to join the MAC, hell they would stay even if they knew they'd lose there next 100 conference games, atleast say the ACC or some place that pays real money. It has to be the easiest site ever to make a troll account, I doubt you could make a post that isn't anti PSU that the folks won't lap up...

I'm for paying PSU to leave though.... lol

fairgambit said: ↑
I have heard rumors that Rutgers is angling for an invitation to join the MAC and the BigTen is willing to give RU 25 million to leave. The only problem is the MAC was hoping to get Temple, which they consider a better program, but Temple thinks they have a long shot at the ACC so they are holding their cards close to the vest. We should know more in December.

https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/who-do-rutgers-fans-think-they-are.148136/page-2
 
Upvote 0
Roundabout said:
yea.... Rutgers would walk away from BigTen money to join the MAC, hell they would stay even if they knew they'd lose there next 100 conference games, atleast say the ACC or some place that pays real money. It has to be the easiest site ever to make a troll account, I doubt you could make a post that isn't anti PSU that the folks won't lap up...

I'm for paying PSU to leave though.... lol

fairgambit said: ↑
I have heard rumors that Rutgers is angling for an invitation to join the MAC and the BigTen is willing to give RU 25 million to leave. The only problem is the MAC was hoping to get Temple, which they consider a better program, but Temple thinks they have a long shot at the ACC so they are holding their cards close to the vest. We should know more in December.

https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/who-do-rutgers-fans-think-they-are.148136/page-2
Click to expand...
They seem to have forgotten that Temple WAS in the MAC........until basically getting booted. They joined the Big East just about the time it disolved, and are now in the AAC.
 
Upvote 0
colobuck79 said:
The guy starts off by saying it was the worst call of all time. :slappy:
Click to expand...

well......that escalated quickly

Not the worst call of all time.
  • PSU kept getting called for delay of game penalties against Michigan because the crowd was too loud.
  • 2 seconds put back on the clock at Michigan
  • Toe-heel
  • Fumble after our TE crossed the goal line vs. Nebraska
  • Tony Johnson catch vs. Michigan
  • OSU interception of Hack that hit the ground but cameras didn't work
  • OSU FG called good even though clock had been expired for 4 seconds
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
Here is what I do (and frankly, I don't get into discussions with people about this all that often)

I say - "Tell me three things you know to be irrefutable facts about the issue. And then, let me respond to them. And after that, tell me three more things you know to be irrefutable facts about the issue. And then, I will respond to those three. And we will keep going from there".

They rarely make it past the second "irrefutable fact" of the first three issues. And if they do, it morphs into conjecture and speculation, and they typically just walk away. In a huff
Click to expand...

That sounds like to the beginning of Buddy Hacketts joke about the duck

"We'll settle this the country way. I'll kick you in the balls as hard as I can, you kick me, until someone quits."
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top