Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's a well written piece. Pretty much covers all the points and the writer is a PSU grad. Unfortunately, It's just a matter of time before he is outed by the cultOpinion: Penn State still hasn't learned anything from the Sandusky scandal
...Penn State supporters seem aghast that Paterno and the university aren’t getting the benefit of the doubt in that equation. Which is absurd. Paterno knew about Sandusky in 2001. He told his bosses. Nothing happened. Sandusky kept abusing boys and remained free for a decade. The university has no credibility. None...
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nca...om-the-sandusky-scandal/ar-BBsOQfo?li=BBnba9I
That's a well written piece. Pretty much covers all the points and the writer is a PSU grad. Unfortunately, It's just a matter of time before he is outed by the cult
Penn State president digs deeper hole in Jerry Sandusky saga
Wetzel nail it. That answers most of the motivation and strategy questions. The comments are 25-1 anti cult
Wetzel nail it. That answers most of the motivation and strategy questions. The comments are 25-1 anti cult
Child rape = Penn State.
Penn State = Child rape.
That's an interesting take. Their validity/invalidity is pretty much the whole thing. Did Paterno know in the 70s? If so, everything after is even worse than what was originally thought.Their validity/invalidity simply doesn't matter too much bigger picture.
I'm not a "cultist", but I think Wetzel swung and missed. It was a subtle miss, but it was a miss.
Barron didn't get angry about what was said in the court ruling. There's nothing to get angry about there.
Neither did Barron make reference to the Freeh Report, he made no reference to 2001.
Barron's anger and message were solely as regards Friday's CNN and NBC stories.
That's an interesting take. Their validity/invalidity is pretty much the whole thing. Did Paterno know in the 70s? If so, everything after is even worse than what was originally thought.
The first line is a very rare take in PSU land, which is why the validity is such a big deal. Your ability to be reasonable is a welcome shift.I had already concluded that JoePa was "a bad person" prior to last week.
Now some folk want to debate between "was Joe a very very very bad person", a "very very bad person", "a very bad person" or a "bad person"? Fair enough if some want to debate that, but it's an irrelevant debate IMO. The point is that he is "bad." Qualifiers beyond that, in the "big picture", it doesn't matter.
Nailed it. It's just so sad :(Yep, and as long as they have idiots like Jay & Scott Paterno, Lubrano, Ziegler and the rest of the Joesus clowns running around trying to prove what a dead guy knew or didn't know, that is the only association people are going to make in regards to PedState.
The ironic part - the Joesus that the cult insists he was - selfless.... humble..... generous..... willing to do whatever was best for beloved Penn State...... That legacy is being trampled on by his me-first, greedy, "fuck-Penn-State-for-disparaging-Joesus" heirs & fans. In trying to protecthis legacytheir meal-ticket, they have ruined him in regards to public opinion. And they can't even recognize it.
They are because he was..... indeed.