buckeydoptimist
certified hoops nut
Not litl. But you did miss Evan Ravenal a 6'8 260 lb PF/C xfer from BC who will be a JR in 2011-2012. And Nikola Kecman would be a SR on that team with Zisis.
I agree though that without Sully the C spot is hurting. I believe Zisis will never contribute here and ER didn't impact much at BC in 2 years so I don't see him as a 30 min starter as a JR. The 2011 class must produce a starting-calibre post player.
Also, I think Smith and Spoon will both potentially be contenders for the starting 3 spot. Smith is likely to move to the outside with Scott and Craft at point. Spoon wants to transition to the 3 spot, and the staff has him shooting 500 3's a day and working on his handle a lot to help that transition, so he will not likely be a PF candidate really. Thomas can also play some 3. So that spot isn't as barren as you make it seem. ER will likely back up at PF and C both some.
Do I think a top-flight 3 like Thompson could start? Yes, if he isn't injured he could jump Smith and Spoon ( I think Sibert starts at 2 regardless ). But it isn't as desparate as you make it seem and we could get by w/o another wing really. Post I wouldn't want to see it, but we are bringing in 3+ wings in this 2010 class ( Sibert(2/3), Spoon(3), Smith(2/3/1), Thomas (4/3)) so it isn't that thin really. It will be inexperienced - but adding a frosh doesn't help that. I'd prefer a talented tall wing, but we may not get one. Parker wouldn't "bother me" as more talent added either!
:osu:
I agree though that without Sully the C spot is hurting. I believe Zisis will never contribute here and ER didn't impact much at BC in 2 years so I don't see him as a 30 min starter as a JR. The 2011 class must produce a starting-calibre post player.
Also, I think Smith and Spoon will both potentially be contenders for the starting 3 spot. Smith is likely to move to the outside with Scott and Craft at point. Spoon wants to transition to the 3 spot, and the staff has him shooting 500 3's a day and working on his handle a lot to help that transition, so he will not likely be a PF candidate really. Thomas can also play some 3. So that spot isn't as barren as you make it seem. ER will likely back up at PF and C both some.
Do I think a top-flight 3 like Thompson could start? Yes, if he isn't injured he could jump Smith and Spoon ( I think Sibert starts at 2 regardless ). But it isn't as desparate as you make it seem and we could get by w/o another wing really. Post I wouldn't want to see it, but we are bringing in 3+ wings in this 2010 class ( Sibert(2/3), Spoon(3), Smith(2/3/1), Thomas (4/3)) so it isn't that thin really. It will be inexperienced - but adding a frosh doesn't help that. I'd prefer a talented tall wing, but we may not get one. Parker wouldn't "bother me" as more talent added either!
:osu:
S&GFAN;1745109; said:Litl, did I touch a nerve? Deep breath..and again.
My data comes from the same place yours does and anyone else not on or attached to the staff. That said, I disagree that this topic is a non-factor based upon where this team will be after next year if Sully is 1 and done. That would leave a HUGE hole at the 5 and a bunch of unproven players everywhere else and almost zero depth. There is also a very good chance Buford leaves as well.
If Sully and Buford leave this is the current roster...
PG - Craft/Smith/Scott
SG - Sibert/Smith
SF - Sibert?
PF - Thomas/Weatherspoon
C - Big Z
Did I miss anyone?
This team lacks talent at several positions and has a HUGE depth issue. Bucks need an impact Wing and Post in the 2011 class. Obviously if Sully and Buford stick around the team will look completely different but that trend is not in the Bucks favor.
Upvote
0