Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There’s one word I have for the Sports Illustrated reporting on Oklahoma State University: Disappointing.
This series is not reflective of Oklahoma State University today. Many of their sensational allegations go back a decade ago.
There have been wholesale changes at the school in recent years in leadership and facilities. During that time, I have given more than $500 million to OSU, for athletics and academics. Have I gotten my money’s worth? You bet. We have a football program that has a commitment to principled sportsmanship. They understand the expectations we, as fans and supporters, have for the program. We have an incredible and growing fan base, and a loyal group of alums that believe in the character of our players, coaches and administrators.
But I do welcome this scrutiny. If people take the time, it’s an opportunity to better understand where Oklahoma State is today, not a decade ago. It’s a different university today. It’s a better university. If there are areas where we need to improve, we’ll do it.
Which leads me back to my disappointment with Sports Illustrated, and their failure to ask the most important question of all: What’s happening at OSU today?
The allegations contained in today's story (and those teased in the upcoming story) are little more than basic regurgitations of what went on at UNC (without the evidence to support NCAA findings). Yet SI is pumping this [Mark May] up to be the story of the fucking century. It is a goddamn joke.
That's the worst part about these stories: the smug sense of self satisfaction that oozes from the pages over "bringing these programs down" or whatever the hell they think they are doing. They spent a paragraph or two of the Tressel story basically taking credit for getting him fired.
Does this mean we're not gonna get to the sex parts.. dammit
They spent a paragraph or two of the Tressel story basically taking credit for getting him fired.
.
“I’m surprised that a credible institution like Sports Illustrated would do a 10 month investigation and all of a sudden have no credible facts,” Weeden told FoxSports.com. “These are guys that aren’t real credible. It’s comical. I can’t wait to read the other four (parts). I really can’t.”
He was particularly critical of Thayer Evans, a writer who, back in 2011, called Oklahoma State ‘Chokie State’ after a win at Texas.
“The guy that wrote the article, he’s an OU guy,” Weeden told reporters. “He’s always had it out for Oklahoma State. When we won at Texas, he asked me, ‘When is it gonna happen, when is Okie State going to pull their Okie Choke like they always do?’ I laughed.”