• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

O.J. Tossed from Restaurant (MERGED)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
stxbuck;835708; said:
Jeff Ruby always makes the news in Cincinnati for doing something unusual in his restaurants in Cincy every few years. He was dragged by a car and almost died a while back, and a couple of years after that, when a party of Bengals gave a $50 tip on a $1000 bill, he chewed out the players and called Mike Brown the next morning.
Click to expand...

If you were employed by Mike Brown, you'd be a penny pincher too.
 
Upvote 0
You're on my list, AKAK.

wnd10.jpg
 
Upvote 0
buckeyefool;835665; said:
The owner< Ruby< is one of the brothers who founded Montgomery Inn.
Click to expand...

You sure about that?

I thought Ted Gregory opened Montgomery Inn in the 50's.


O.J. Simpson's attorney, Yale Galanter, sees the incident in an entirely different way. He later said the incident was about race and that he intended to pursue the matter and said he might possibly go after Ruby's liquor license. Galanter said by phone: "He screwed with the wrong guy, he really did."

Yale Galanter is a criminal attorney who has not only represented O.J. Simpson in his "road rage" case in Florida, he is supposedly some kind of spokesman for his client as well.

Whether Galanter's vision of playing 'the race card' is viable remains to be seen. He doesn't have a Mark Fuhrman in Jeff Ruby. Indeed, this is not the first time that Simpson has been in Ruby's restaurant. In fact, Mr. Ruby used to have a picture of himself and O.J. hanging on the wall but after all of the events that transpired since the 1994 killings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, he took the photo down.

"This was the only thing I could do for the victims' families," Ruby later said. He added that approximately 50 other people in the private room where Simpson had been seated "stood up and applauded me" when Simpson left.
Click to expand...
LINK

I wonder if Micheal Jordan will end up subpoenaed since he was served immediately after Juice was booted. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
WoodyWorshiper;836558; said:
Uh, no. He was found "Not Guilty." Jurors do NOT have the option of voting for "Innocent." And by the way, there is a HUGE difference between calling someone "innocent" and calling them "not guilty."
Click to expand...

:roll1:
Uh, no there is not. A trial is used to determine if somebody is guilty. Hence, "not guilty." A person is innocent until presumed guilty.

Hence, he is innocent.

Gee, I didn't think the Constitution was that hard to understand. :roll1:
 
Upvote 0
tibor75;836564; said:
:roll1:
Uh, no there is not. A trial is used to determine if somebody is guilty. Hence, "not guilty." A person is innocent until presumed guilty.

Hence, he is innocent.

Gee, I didn't think the Constitution was that hard to understand. :roll1:
Click to expand...

Nice post dipstick, "a person is innocent until PRESUMED guilty?" What the fuck was that? Roll your eyes all you want because in actuality a person is " innocent until proven guilty." Courts do not "prove" that you are innocent by finding you Not Guilty. "Not Guilty" doesn't mean you didn't do it, it means that evidence was not presented to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Go be the V$hicken Shit that you are now and edit that ridiculous post. "Innocent until presumed Guilty." Thats a Hall Of Fame Dumbfuck post if I ever read one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
tibor75;836564; said:
Uh, no there is not. A trial is used to determine if somebody is guilty. Hence, "not guilty." A person is innocent until presumed guilty. Hence, he is innocent. Gee, I didn't think the Constitution was that hard to understand.
Click to expand...
:slappy:

by the way, do we have a "dumbass" award?

do you honestly think that if a trial finds a defendant not guilty, it then means that the defendant is found innocent? it should also be pointed out that actual innocence or guilt is independent of the result of a trial. if a person has committed a crime, the result of the trial doesn't matter. the person is still actually guilty.
 
Upvote 0
reading material for tibor:

Not Guilty Does Not Mean Innocent

Massachusetts Bar Association
When a jury returns a verdict of not guilty, that means that the state has not convinced the jury beyond a reasonable doubt as to all the elements of the crime with which the defendant has been charged. For example, in a first degree murder case, the state must prove that the defendant deliberately and with malice unlawfully caused the death of another human being. If the defendant presents a valid defense that he killed the victim in self-defense, then the defendant is not innocent of homicide -- he did in fact kill another human being -- but he is "not guilty" of homicide because the state did not convince the jury that the defendant acted with premeditated malice aforethought.

Continued...
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
OSU_Buckguy;836572; said:
:slappy:

by the way, do we have a "dumbass" award?

do you honestly think that if a trial finds a defendant not guilty, it then means that the defendant is found innocent? it should also be pointed out that actual innocence or guilt is independent of the result of a trial. if a person has committed a crime, the result of the trial doesn't matter. the person is still actually guilty.
Click to expand...

Dude, nice work but i'm sure our "slurpy-server" is long gone by now. Your synopsis was WAY too detailed for Tibor to comprehend. It's "stool sample" time and I'm sure our friend is busy doing what he does best.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top