cincibuck
You kids stay off my lawn!
What, All American linebacker leads the world to believe he's found the girl of his dreams - which turns out to be true - and along with the university spins a sad story about cancer and his inability to ever be with her which "accidentally" bumps his point total in Heisman race, only to have the press discover the whole thing is a farce, and that isn't funny?Unfunny joke that contributes nothing to the debate.
And the university says, "Oh, we didn't know about the girl, the kid in the cherry picker, or whatever happened to Lizzy Seeberg."
Question: On November 18, 2006 were Ohio State and Michigan ranked #1 and 2?That Michigan team finished the season losing to OSU and getting trounced by USC in the Rose Bowl. Finished the season #9 in the coaches poll and #8 in the AP poll. A good season, but that's not saying a whole lot when it's your best season since 1997.
Regardless of how they finished the season, those two teams played for the right to be in the NC game, a rare meeting of 1 & 2 teams. If you diminish Michigan in this case then you diminish what Ohio State accomplished on that day too.
And one half more than Notre Dame has earned over your 20 year test platform.That's half a NC to you.
And in the last 10, Michigan has won 6 and ND 4. Hardly a domination.
Considering that you believe Notre Dame to be "more relevant," it's a result that defies the logic of your statements.
Look, I get that you hate ND, and you like Michigan much, much more. Frankly, I don't like either team and neither has performed in the past 20 years up to its historical standards. But recently ND was in the national championship game, while Michigan was recently in the B-dubbs bowl.
All of that said,the article isn't about whether ND is more relevant than Michigan. It's about whether Michigan is relevant (which they're not).
The article is based on statements from Notre Dame officials - not Michigan. The tone is arrogant - something you get from both schools- and implies that Notre Dame - who must ALWAYS be considered relevant - has dropped Michigan because the Wolverines are no longer relevant. And the time span for making the decision that Michigan was no longer relevant covers the last 5 years. A time span in which the Irish have been a stunning 1 and 4 against a Michigan program that hasn't done much.
In the words of the man who overlooks Notre Dame Stadium: "Why do you look at the splinter in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?" And no, I don't "like Michigan much, much, more," than Notre Dame. I just consider them less offensive.
Upvote
0