• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Next Generation Console News: Xbox One, PS4, Wii U

Mac;2345181; said:
If you can buy used games by buying disks, why would you think about just doing digital downloads? I don't understand that.

If I am unable to play used games via digital download, then I will only buy disks, and install it onto the system if we are able to do that

I have never bought a used game, ever
 
Upvote 0
oh BTW

http://ps4daily.com/2013/06/sony-used-game-drm-is-up-to-game-publishers-on-playstation-4/

There has been a lot of fuss about used games on the PlayStation 4. Would Sony do what Microsoft is doing, and setup a complex system that limits used games on the system, or would they do what they did on the PS3?
Sony has (sort of) answered that question. The company said that they won’t mandate DRM on used games on the PlayStation 4 like Microsoft. However, game publishers will be free to implement their own system if they chose to. And considering how game publishers have complained about used games for years, it’s likely that most of them will implement some sort of system that limits second-hand sales of their games.

Today on the PS3, players can purchase and play used games. But publishers can require the game to be registered, especially when playing online. EA’s “online pass” required gamers to pay $10 if they wanted to play a used game online.

At the very least, it’s good to know that Sony won’t implement a DRM system themselves on the PlayStation 4. Recently, a Twitter campaign was lobbying Sony not to force used PlayStation 4 games to be registered online.

but because it's Sony...no shits will be given
 
Upvote 0
George Costanza;2345198; said:
did you keep every one of your used games? Or did you trade them in?

i traded some in, kept some

always did it through amazon when I did a trade in..


you'll still be able to trade in games on the xbone, just certain retailers, and there's no way amazon won't be one
 
Upvote 0
Bucknut24;2345205; said:
i traded some in, kept some

always did it through amazon when I did a trade in..


you'll still be able to trade in games on the xbone, just certain retailers, and there's no way amazon won't be one

...and you don't think the license/activation fee that used games are going to require won't take a cut out of the price you would get a a reseller?

When Amazon resells an Xbone game that you sent them, they are going to have to sell for lower prices now so that they can actually move the product and be able to differentiate it from the price of a new disc.

I don't buy many games at all these days, but I have sold back a few of the sports games that I have bought. The ability to get a decent price is part of what enticed me to buy in the first place. I would have never considered buying MLB 12 The Show new for $60 if I wasn't going to be able resell it for 50-60% of it's original price if I didn't like it - which is exactly what happened. If we were to go back to getting pennies on the dollar or nothing at all because of restrictions and license fees, then it would heavily suppress my desire buy games in the first place.

Video games cost a lot more than other forms of digital entertainment, and the previews or demos that you get can often misrepresent the quality of the product. The higher price tag already means there's a high amount of risk for consumers if the product doesn't live up to their expectations, and now the industry is trying to shift even more of the risk for a bad/overpriced game away from themselves and on to the consumers.

I can think of a lot of game studios that have failed. Some good ones perhaps haven't made it, but the gaming community mostly rewards the good stuff while the lousy stuff sinks. I have read plenty of stories about titles or studios that have failed because of their own outsized ambitions or largesse. I have never read a story about a title or studio that failed because of used game sales.
 
Upvote 0
Bucknut24;2345194; said:

Sony has already said that the console is not going to require an internet connection. Therefore, what they're saying about publishers being ale to institute DRM on used games is exactly what they're already able to do. As the article mentions, EA already required people to pay to unlock multiplayer on used games. XBone is going to be always online, so publishers can charge used games whether they're being played multiplayer or not.

I couldn't care less about multiplayer, so Sony is still hands down the winner here.
 
Upvote 0
d174b3dd54300e059aa2b3de881b5e4b_large


:lol:
 
Upvote 0
The thing that gets me - PS3 enjoyed great success oversea's where
The 360 didn't. The trend won't be changing soon.

But with a cheaper introductory price and couple in the lack of DRM
Function and 'always on' - the PS4 might get back to where the PS and
PS2 left off in domestic success.
 
Upvote 0
CentralMOBuck;2345294; said:
Don't forget that many games already require an online pass. So regardless what the consoles say, it's out of their hands. EA has been doing this for a few years already.

Yep, but EA just got rid of their online pass, which is great for buying used games!
 
Upvote 0
Bucknut24;2345351; said:
They got rid of the online pass cause of ms policy.. They could charge for ps4 still

They'd be freaking stupid to charge for one system and not for another. Again, I'm pretty sure EA has said they aren't bringing it back anyways
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top