at some point, you lose the ability to mock others for focusing on uniforms.MaxBuck;1655955; said:I'm not sure if I'm encouraged or disappointed by the revelation that other fan bases can be as silly about uniform design as ours is.
Nike is not effective in their designs. If they were, they wouldn't have to overhaul their designs every 1-3 years. Oregon, boise st, Miami, etc.Josh, why do say Nike is the "worst innovator," when all the athletes I know think Nike is both effective and stylish in their designs?
The uniforms with good designs are the ones they inherited from other companies/designers, and they merely streamlined and modernized them.
Nike's flagship school. Literally two dozen or more uniform designs in the past decade. 95% of them are widely regarded as an eyesore.
Putting a bra on their rivals easily the most inexcusable and idiotic design I've seen in sports.
Those hated shoulder patches that leak and Marcus vick wore.
if a designer can't provide both, then they aren't very good at their jobs.Nike stuff is usually re-designed for improved comfort, lighter weight, equal or improved protectiveness, and appeal to today's young athletes. Sorry it doesn't conform to your hidebound notions of "tradition," but maybe even you could accept the idea of function over form.
The function is not the reason the design stinks.
And I'd suggest that they aren't as offensive in their designs for school uniforms. They are trendy and flash in the pan, but they don't make you want to gouge your eyes out. Texas tech, Maryland, south Carolina. Not great, not bad.The only athletic gear companies that I think are superior to Nike in developing superior function in their clothing are Under Armour and lululemon, and both of those companies are much more limited in their offerings.
Maryland and Texas tech don't need to change their uniforms after 2 years. Oregon has to, because they don't have a quality design. They rely on a very weak design that does not last beyond 18 months before it is tired. When is the last time someone looked at a Michigan helmet and thought its design was past its prime? How bout osu's? Texas?
Oregons wings are gimmicky and will undoubtedly need to be replaced or changed within 3 years. That's bad design.
Upvote
0