• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Need another reason to hate Walmart? Here ya go...

Dryden;1641407; said:
The problem for the old man in this is that he was hired as a greeter, not a security guard. I doubt WalMart, or any other supercenter, includes asset protection and recovery as part of the job training for the elderly and semi-retired employees they hire to work as greeters. The employee escalated the situation by following the customer out to the parking lot to get the license plate number. That act was innocent enough on its own, but also well outside the realm of his job duties, which is even before his attempt to wrestle the clipboard back from the customer after both came back into the store. At the point where the customer returns to the store to steal the clipboard, the greeter needs to surrender it and call for assistance or trained security personnel.

For highlighted portions, I call total bullshit. First highlighted point, he didn't "escalte" shit...he went out to obtain information that would help proper authorities solve a crime (poissbly a felont depnding on the value of the item stolen). He was well within his right to do so, and Walmart should be commending him, not firing him, for his efforts is trying to bring the perp to justice and possibly recover the stolen item.

For the second highlighted portion, if the law followed your suggestion then self-defense would go right out the window. If someone was beating your ass, you'd have to take it until the perp was done and then report the beating to the police in the hopes they'd catch him and subsequently prove he did it. Or, if you had someone break into your house to steal stuff, you'd have to sit there and watch while the burglar took what he wanted, instead of taking any measures needed to protect home and property.

Fuck the perp. The second he layed his hand on grampa, grampa had every right to fight back regardless of his being on the clock. I hope Walmart has to pay gramps seven figures, and the tough guy who beat on a near-70-year-old man gets to be somebody's cell bitch for a decade.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;1643875; said:
For highlighted portions, I call total bull[censored]. First highlighted point, he didn't "escalte" [censored]...he went out to obtain information that would help proper authorities solve a crime (poissbly a felont depnding on the value of the item stolen). He was well within his right to do so, and Walmart should be commending him, not firing him, for his efforts is trying to bring the perp to justice and possibly recover the stolen item.


What would happen if that employee was shot in the parking lot and died?
Not only that person lost his life...but Wal-Mart would be involved in a bigger mess and costing them lots of $$$.
For Wal-Mart...everything starts and ends with money.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyePride;1643881; said:
What would happen if that employee was shot in the parking lot and died?
Not only that person lost his life...but Wal-Mart would be involved in a bigger mess and costing them lots of $$$.
For Wal-Mart...everything starts and ends with money.

I'm sure what ever financial problem Wal*Mart found themselves in would be covered by the life insurace policy they took out on said employee.

:p
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyePride;1643881; said:
What would happen if that employee was shot in the parking lot and died?
Not only that person lost his life...but Wal-Mart would be involved in a bigger mess and costing them lots of $$$.
For Wal-Mart...everything starts and ends with money.

I didn't say that Walmart should have required the geezer to go out and get the license number, only that he should not have been fired for defending himself regardless if the attack was a result of his going out to the parking lot. If he did get shot while in the parking lot, Walmart would/should not be held liable because he went out on his own accord and not because of a job requirement.
 
Upvote 0
FCollinsBuckeye;1641452; said:
Anyone here have an old abandoned Wal*Mart in their town? Y'know, with the associated old abandoned strip mall associated with it? And then the shiny new Super Wal*Mart on the outskirts of town? Ft. Collins does.

The defenders of Wal*Mart hold up these ideals of capitalism, as if the market place is succeeding when we've consolidated our retailer into a giant one-stop shop that 'sells for less!'.

The insidious other side of the coin here is that Wal*Mart manipulates our communities such that they are able to 'sell for less!'. Call me a conspiracy theorist if you wish, but the reality is that Wal*Mart has done the following in many communites, mine included. They put up a Wal*Mart years ago, offered their Chinese wares at 'everyday low prices!' Shopping habits change, we all like to save money after all, right? Several smaller retails fall by the wayside and our choices are increasingly limited and Wal*Mart has a developed a large customer base. Capitalism is working, and the 'marketplace' is happy. the local community is still getting sales tax revenue regardless of whether people are shopping at Wal*Mart or 'Mom and Pops General Store', so we're still getting some community benefit from the retail sector.

Fast-forward 5 or 10 years, Wal*Mart builds a brand new, shiny SUPER Wal*Mart outside the city limits! One that can serve the two communities on either side of it. Wal*Mart is able to consolidate it's operations in two towns, and can avoid costly city sale and property taxes! Prices are even lower! Great for the consumer!

Only, it's bad for the community. These huge hits on smaller towns sales tax revenues kill local budgets and reduce the quality of services offered in those towns. Things like schools, police protection, fire protection, snow removal, parks maintenance, etc. Things that make communites worth living in.

Many Americans will say "good! Public schools waste tax payers money! They need to get more efficient anyway! Privatize community services! It's more efficient! etc, etc". It's my opinion these Americans can't see the forest for the trees. We need public servants. Our country was founded and grown by public servants. We need public servants at the most local levels, they are our friends and neighbors and they work on our dime to make our communities work. And since they are public servants, they are accountable to us. The strategies of Wal*Mart are unravelling communities across America.

The United States of America didn't go from being a fledgling country to the strongest economic power on on the planet in less than 200 years, as the result of a government program. The only reason we can afford the millions of "public servants" you hold so near and dear to your heart is because of evil capitalists generating wealth and paying taxes.

The largest sinkholes of wealth in this country are government programs that are so fucking inefficient they have to go trillions of dollars into debt just to keep them afloat, all the while rewarding their inefficiency.

But yeah, Wal Mart is the problem. :roll1:
 
Upvote 0
Wal-Mart sure isn't the problem, and it's not evil in the least. Many orphans and widows rely upon their profits in their investment portfolios as an income stream, so they have an obligation to keep them as high as possible. It's their fiduciary responsibility. I'm sick to death of ignoramuses who decry "obscene profits" or "evil corporate greed." If you don't like it, invest so you can benefit too.

With that said, the federal government is spending trillions largely because Private Industry (largely REITs and other real-estate focused businesses) lost even more trillions in generating the value bubble whose collapse caused the worldwide depression we find ourselves in. No kudos to government, whom I do not trust with my money, but it's not like private companies aren't also fully capable of screwing the pooch. (As a WorldCom shareholder, I know this all too well. Who'd like my 10,000 shares, once worth about $1.2 mil? I'll trade you for a pack of gum.)
 
Upvote 0
Robert Jenkins Arrested for Peeing on Steaks at Walmart - True Crime Report

When heading off to jail, it's best to commit a crime that will provide you with a manly story to tell your fellow inmates, something a little more desperado-like than, say, knee-capping a rival figure skater. Working as a hired gun for the Mafia always sounds good...

Armored car heists always have a nice ring to them. And even if you're not quite up to something this ambitious, you can still trot out the old resisting arrest.

Unfortunately, Robert T. Jenkins now sits in jail with probably the worst criminal tale ever. He was arrested at a Walmart in Canton, Ohio for peeing on steaks. Yes, you heard that right.

Cops were called to the store after Jenkins simply walked up to the meat counter, pulled out his manly apparatus -- which we hope isn't capable of reproduction -- and begin peeing on the steak selection.

No one seems to know why he did it, unless he was practicing a bold new form of marinating.

The poor dope supposedly ruined $600 worth meat. (Be careful, Canton area shoppers. This being Walmart, there's a good chance they simply hosed them down and put them back on display.)
 
Upvote 0
http://247wallst.com/2012/11/21/the-12-companies-paying-americans-the-least/

Sears, Target, McDonald's, YUM Brands, Walm*rt...

3.8 million so-called jobs!

A drop in the 156 million US labor force bucket, but significant none-the-less because as consumer sentiment and spending pick up, most of the short-term "growth" and expansion is going to come through these five employers.

Anyone know where I can get the same number (retail jobs) going back 10, 20, 30 years?

The 12 Companies Paying Americans the Least

November 21, 2012
by 24/7wallst

The gap between rich and poor is well illustrated by the large multi-billion dollar corporations employing thousands of low-wage workers. With the Great Recession over, not only are many of these companies now hitting record profits, but their executive pay remains spectacularly high. Meanwhile, according to a report released by the National Employment Law Project, the current federal minimum wage the workers are often paid, is worth 30% less than it was in 1968 in terms of purchasing power.


Two-thirds of low-wage workers - those that are paid less than $10 an hour - are employed by large corporations with at least 100 employees reports NELP. All of the largest companies in low-wage industries, including McDonald?s, Walmart, and Starbucks own hundreds, even thousands, of stores across the country. Based on NELP's July 2012 report, "Big Business, Corporate Profits, and the Minimum Wage," 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 12 American companies that pay the least.

These employers fall into one of two categories. They are are either large national restaurant chains such as McDonald's, Burger King, and Starbucks, employing tens of thousands of cashiers and cooks. Seven of the 12 companies fall into this category. The others are large national retailers, employing tens of thousands of cashiers and salespeople, like Walmart, Target, and Sears.

In addition to low wages, many of these companies have a history of poor labor relations that extends beyond underpaying their employees. Long hours, unsafe or unpleasant working conditions, limited benefits and restricting access to full-time work, often accompany minimum wage jobs in many of these companies.

[...]

5. Sears
> U.S. workforce: 264,000
> CEO compensation: $9,932,924
> Revenue: $41.57 billion
> Net income: -$3.11 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 3,510
Many companies like to tout how important their employees are, and Sears Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHLD) is no different. "Our associates are at the heart of our company and we value teamwork, integrity, and positive energy," says the company's website. Unfortunately for the employees, the operator of Sears and Kmart has struggled in recent years, as evidenced by its recent massive $3.11 billion net loss, despite having revenue of $41.6 billion. In addition, similar to Walmart and Target, Sears and Kmart stores will be open on Thanksgiving for early Black Friday shopping, meaning the employees will have to work this holiday. Sears said it expects holiday hiring to be about the same as a year ago, while Walmart, Toys-R-Us and other retailers increased their seasonal hires.

4. Target
> U.S. workforce: 365,000
> CEO compensation: $19,707,107
> Revenue: $69.87 billion
> Net income: $2.93 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 1,763
Shortly after competitor Walmart announced that it would open its doors for Black Friday shoppers at 8 p.m. Thursday, Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT) then said that it would also open its doors Thursday night. Employees were not thrilled by the news. One California-based Target worker drafted a petition calling on Target to "save Thanksgiving" and stick to its Friday opening time. More than 220,000 people have signed the petition. Target insists that it took employees into consideration before making the decision to open early. One executive said, "We had so many team members who wanted to work on Thursday that hundreds of our stores are now keeping lists of volunteers who want to work if shifts open up."

3. McDonald's
> U.S. workforce: 859,978
> CEO compensation: $4,073,748
> Revenue: $27.01 billion
> Net income: $5.50 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 14,098
McDonald?s (NYSE: MCD) is the king of fast-food, with revenue greater than any other restaurant operator on this list, and far more locations as well. The company's website offers a long list of awards and recognition for the diversity of its workplace. But even McDonald's is not immune to economic pressures. The company just reported its first monthly drop in global revenue at locations open more than a year, down 1.8% in October. McDonald's USA president, Jan Fields was subsequently ousted to be replaced by Jeff Stratton, who is currently global chief restaurant officer.

2. Yum! Brands
> U.S. workforce: 880,330
> CEO compensation: $20,411,852
> Revenue: $12.63 billion
> Net income: $1.33 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 16,006
Because Yum! Brands Inc. (NYSE: YUM), the operator of the Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and KFC chains, is one of the biggest employers of low wage workers, it takes benefits seriously. According to watchdog group Center for Media and Democracy, the fast food giant co-chaired the labor and business regulation subcommittee of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a "corporate-funded bill mill" that encourages laws that benefits its corporate members. At a 2011 meeting, attendees considered model bills designed to override paid sick leave legislation in the states. In 2012, following negative press over ALEC initiatives and the departure of McDonald's, Wendy's, Yum! Brands became one of several large companies to abandon the council.

1. Walmart
> U.S. workforce: 1,400,000
> CEO compensation: $18,131,738
> Revenue: $446.95 billion
> Net income: $15.70 billion
> No. of U.S. stores: 3,868
The labor practices of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) have long received negative attention in the press, but that has not affected investors much. WMT's share price rose more than 48% in the past five years. In 2008, Walmart agreed to pay $640 million in settlements of dozens of class-action lawsuits that claimed the company deprived workers of pay for time worked. In October a class action lawsuit was filed in a Chicago federal court alleging that the retailer had violated minimum wage and overtime laws. Walmart workers have begun to strike, and some plan to walk off the job on Black Friday, the busiest shopping day of the year. Walmart has filed an unfair-labor-practice complaint against the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union to prevent this from happening.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
About 10 years ago, I came across a chart in one of my wife's public health magazines showing the growth in obesity rates in the US going back to the 1960's. At about the same time, I was working on a project looking at the growth rate in retail chains such as Target and Walm*rt for a b-school case. It occured to me that that there's a correlation there and have, ever since, meant to actually try and directly correlelate those two data sets.

Well... it seems like a UNC prof has already undertaken that thread (except he's focused on Walm*rt Supercenters only, but the results are still, well... staggering.

http://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/uncgec/2009_003.html

Supersizing Supercenters? The Impact of Wal-Mart Supercenters on Body Mass Index and Obesity

Charles Courtemanche
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Greensboro - Department of Economics


affiliation not provided to SSRN

September 10, 2010​

Abstract:
Researchers have linked the rise in obesity to technological progress reducing the opportunity cost of food consumption and increasing the opportunity cost of physical activity. We examine this hypothesis in the context of Walmart Supercenters, whose advancements in retail logistics have translated to substantial reductions in the prices of food and other consumer goods. Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System matched with Walmart Supercenter entry dates and locations, we examine the effects of Supercenters on body mass index (BMI) and obesity. We account for the endogeneity of Walmart Supercenter locations with an instrumental variables approach that exploits the unique geographical pattern of Supercenter expansion around Walmart?s headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas. An additional Supercenter per 100,000 residents increases average BMI by 0.24 units and the obesity rate by 2.3 percentage points. These results imply that the proliferation of Walmart Supercenters explains 10.5% of the rise in obesity since the late 1980s, but the resulting increase in medical expenditures offsets only a small portion of consumers? savings from shopping at Supercenters.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60
Keywords: Walmart, Wal-Mart, warehouse clubs, obesity, body weight, body mass index
JEL Classification: I10, D0, L81, R10 working papers series

Download This Paper
 

Attachments

  • SSRN_ID1702071_code450981.pdf
    1.1 KB · Views: 1
Upvote 0
shetuck;2270725; said:
About 10 years ago, I came across a chart in one of my wife's public health magazines showing the growth in obesity rates in the US going back to the 1960's. At about the same time, I was working on a project looking at the growth rate in retail chains such as Target and Walm*rt for a b-school case. It occured to me that that there's a correlation there and have, ever since, meant to actually try and directly correlelate those two data sets.
Why do you think they have those fleets of Fat-Fucker Scooters at every Wal-Mart?

FatPersonScooter.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top