My only point is that when a company makes record profits and expands every quarter, there was once an understanding that employees would reap the benifits too. Our tax dollars subsidize Wal-Mart on several levels. I saw a statistic that said in 1965 and 1975, a person making minimum wage made roughly 20k a year in today's dollars. The same job today pays 5k less. You can't become mgmt at Wal-Mart without starting at the min wage end, and you can't afford to live starting at min wage. So Wal-Mart shows it's employees how to file for govt assistance. Our taxes pay for Wal-Mart full-time employees to eat, while the Walton heirs are worth 20b each. I don't fault Wal-Mart for making money. I do say fuck them for paying lobbyists to "persuade" congress to keep the min wage low and to raise snap money so that they can pay their employees [Mark May], forcing them to use their food stamps at Wal-Mart. It's a ridiculous circle jerk.
I also find it absurd that every grocery store I know of gives employees some kind of discount on food. Wal-Mart doesn't. Because they know if you're working there, you're most likely getting food assistance, and they're not trying to cut tax payers any breaks.