methomps
an imbecility, a stupidity without name
Gatorubet;1731706; said:And the fact that he "resigned before the investigation got to him" likely spared FSU far more serious penalties than they received. FSU breathed a sigh of relief when he refused to cooperate. Saying that "FSU tried to get him to cooperate" may be factually true. I'm sure there is a letter somewhere with an FSU logo asking him to testify. But if he had, and his employe is to be believed, he would have had to address charges that he ordered the academic counselors to give answers to athletes and make sure that they stayed eligible. The assumption is that it came from "pray for a misdemeanor" "Warsaw Rules" Bowden and his staff. His fortuitous absence was a Godsend for the Noles.
That whole self serving set of circumstances is what I was talking about. And yet FSU was found to have "cooperated", even though the first self investigation by FSU did not find any wrongdoping by the football team, and even though FSU had to keep sending new revisions/submissions of their story to the NCAA.
All I am saying is that - me, personally - places less credibility on that finding by the NCAA when they can also apply it to that horse abortion of an FSU fact situation. Does not mean USC did anything wrong by application, but it does not mean that they were forthcoming either, at least not soley by virtue of a finding of "cooperation".
Then I suppose it's a good thing USC didn't part ways with McNair a couple years ago. Lord knows that would've been interpreted as removing him from NCAA jurisdiction.
Of course, there are regional subtleties in the definition of cooperation. FSU, being in the South, was considered A- compliant simply by virtue of not misleading NCAA investigators as to the street address of the athletics department.
Upvote
0