• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Miami (FL) Hurricanes (1926-2003)

Flocka;1970612; said:
Da_End.gif

that didn't take long.......LSU freak FTW!
 
Upvote 0
OH10;1970598; said:
I'm not sure they can. Their last major violations case was in 1995. In order to be considered a repeat violator, wouldn't the allegations have to come within 5 years of the prior sanctions? And without that status, I'm not sure they would get any more than a 3-year bowl ban and several scholarship reductions.

Dear Jeebus. (Other than the stuff the other guys have said) Do you really want a wall of Text from Ubet explaining why they could if they wanted to, and might even if they weren't on probation?

When. Will. We. Learn?

:biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
scarletmike;1970607; said:
There is a by-law (forget which one, think its back in the 30s) that would allow the NCAA to go beyond the statute of limitations and take the entire eight years worth of violations together. Combined with their 3-year probation from 05-08, there is no way that Da U gets off easy.

EDIT: Don't know where 5 years came from.

I'll do some additional research on it, but I don't see any major violations from Miami since 2005. The five-year rule is under the repeat violator section. For example, Ohio State is considered a repeat violator because of the FTM charge involving O'Brien in 2006.
 
Upvote 0
OH10;1970628; said:
I'll do some additional research on it, but I don't see any major violations from Miami since 2005. The five-year rule is under the repeat violator section. For example, Ohio State is considered a repeat violator because of the FTM charge involving O'Brien in 2006.

This was quoted (third-hand, mind you) earlier in the thread.

As required by NCAA legislation for any institution involved in a major infractions case, Miami shall be subject to the provisions of NCAA Bylaw 19.6.2.3, concerning repeat violators, for a five-year period beginning on the effective date of the penalties in this case, February 27, 2003.

Any major violation occurring between February 27, 2003 and February 26, 2008 would trigger repeat violator status for the Hurricanes.
 
Upvote 0
Dryden;1970591; said:
The NCAA is going to nuke Miami.

OH10;1970598; said:
I'm not sure they can. Their last major violations case was in 1995. In order to be considered a repeat violator, wouldn't the allegations have to come within 5 years of the prior sanctions? And without that status, I'm not sure they would get any more than a 3-year bowl ban and several scholarship reductions.

AKAK;1970616; said:
Dear Jeebus. (Other than the stuff the other guys have said) Do you really want a wall of Text from Ubet explaining why they could if they wanted to, and might even if they weren't on probation?

When. Will. We. Learn?

:biggrin:

MaxBuck;1970624; said:

pc-children-books_01.jpg


Fine. Read it yourselves then....
 
Upvote 0
OH10;1970628; said:
I'll do some additional research on it, but I don't see any major violations from Miami since 2005. The five-year rule is under the repeat violator section. For example, Ohio State is considered a repeat violator because of the FTM charge involving O'Brien in 2006.

They're subject to 'repeat violator' status. The 5-year period started in late February, 2003 for this violation (baseball mostly, also basketball related). NCAA,News.archive

SI.com

All that's seemingly left is the biggie -- the death penalty -- and it's entirely possible: Miami qualifies as a repeat violator for any violations before Feb. 27, 2008, stemming from it mid-90s Pell Grant scandal.

Stewart Mandel isn't accurate in calling it probation from the Pell scandal, since the punishment from that was handed down in late 1995.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/

Nevin Shapiro: CONFESSIONS

- "One Easter I paid the Bishop of Miami $150k to let Vilma run through every church holding a pig heart, screaming 'KALI MA!'"

- "Shockey was pretty tame, actually. I think I bought him a watch and a nice pair of jeans. Oh, and like 78 abortions."

- "Frank Gore took $40k from me and had all the liner notes from Cooleyhighharmony tattooed on his soft palate."

- "To be fair, I thought Brock had a medical need for a new liver. I didn't know he just thought his old one was 'super gay.'"

- "Have you ever seen a baby deer released from a lunar landing module into the cold vacuum of space? Jon Peattie has."

- "Funny story - at the '04 Peach Bowl I sent Charlie Strong a sculpture of Sade made of coke. Thought he was a recruit."

- "We had a standing $40 bounty for making Brian St. Pierre wonder if he was adopted. Had to lower it from $400."

- "Yeah, I paid the curator of the British Museum $15k to let Ken Dorsey [Mark May] on a mummy. Didn't think much of it at the time."

:lol:
 
Upvote 0
OH10;1970598; said:
I'm not sure they can. Their last major violations case was in 1995. In order to be considered a repeat violator, wouldn't the allegations have to come within 5 years of the prior sanctions? And without that status, I'm not sure they would get any more than a 3-year bowl ban and several scholarship reductions.

I don't give a fuck if Duh U was never on probation. This shit is so deep, so extensive, so blatant, so egregious, that the death penalty is the only answer. It's as bad, if not worse, than the shit SMU was pulling before they got killed.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Back
Top