knapplc
Nebraska is a Volleyball school
Diego-Bucks;1924613; said:Is this the same argument of "like what you like" that says the Oscars for Best Picture ought to also be tied to the film that grosses the most in theaters? I get that if something is entertaining then it doesn't matter too much the how or why its entertaining. But if popularity contests are all that's needed then Michael Bay films would always win Oscars since he makes things entertaining and millions of folks eat it up. And Transformers 2 is not a classic.
What I'm saying is that I think its important to find out what makes a good novel good and not just entertaining. Critics have their place. Tolkien's work is great and I can't see it being bested as a novel that brings the history and depth to the story. There are other fantasy novels that are also great, for different reasons. Dissecting them can allow me to understand where these authors excelled and find similar great works.
This has nothing to do with Oscars and box office gross. And what do critics have to do with what you like? They can act as a guide, I suppose, but you can't tell me that you've never hated a movie a critic liked or liked a movie the critics panned, can you?
There's a local critic who usually likes the kinds of movies I like, but he misses my tastes sometimes. I use him as a sounding board for recommendations, but in the end I see a movie if *I* think it'll be good, not because of him. I'll read some of the books people have mentioned here because it sounds like they probably have decent taste, but it's no guarantee I'll like them. But because I do or do not like their recommended books shouldn't diminish their enjoyment of them. Right?
Upvote
0