• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
ScriptOhio;1928181; said:
The-Hangover-2-Movie-Poster.jpg


Don't leave the theater too early. There are additional pictures from a cell phone during the credits.

Hollywood blockbuster could change film for DVDs

The ?Hangover II? might have a very different look by the time it comes out on DVD. Actor Ed Helms? face could be digitally altered to remove his tattoo. Hollywood Reporter says Warner Bros. informed a Missouri judge that if it can?t work out its legal battle over the tattoo by the time it comes out on DVD and Blue-ray, the studio will have it changed. A Missouri tattoo artist filed a lawsuit against the movie studio over the unique tattoo he gave Mike Tyson, which he claims to own copyrights too.

Entire article: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hangover-ii-tattoo-lawsuit-warner-196349

:slappy:
 
Upvote 0
the ending of the movie was a little uncomfortable with what is said in the last scene and knowing about this lawsuit.......:lol: I wonder if that was added in at the last minute.




Watched The Mechanic last night. Pretty much the same character Statham always played, but still a fun movie.
 
Upvote 0
Saw Fast Five tonight. A tad disappointed, but what do you expect with a PG-13 rating. Had that been rated R, there probably would have been TONS more race scenes (which were noticeably absent throughout), more violence (which is necessary if you watched the last one), and an all around better product. It had a good story line and a decent plot, but just too predictable. Again, I blame the rating more than anything.

Going back to the lack of racing, you have to think they cut most of it out to go more towards the "we don't support street racing" view. :shake:
 
Upvote 0
Muck;1938206; said:
I think a PG-13 rating revolves more around a lack of nudity.

Shooting people in the face is fine for pre-teens...but god forbid they see some boobies.

I was watching Dumb and Dumber on cable a couple years back. They left in the scene where Harry gets shot multiple times in the hotel room but edited out the sound in the bathroom scene when he has diarrhea after Lloyd spikes his drink. Made perfect sense to me. :huh:
 
Upvote 0
Muck;1938206; said:
I think a PG-13 rating revolves more around a lack of nudity.

Shooting people in the face is fine for pre-teens...but god forbid they see some boobies.
That's where my grandparents were cool, they had no problem with us kids seeing naked people on TV but once they started swearing my grandmother was changing the channel.
 
Upvote 0
Bucklion;1938340; said:
So if you muted the porn, it was all good?

:banger:
Well, I don't know about full blown porn but I remember staying with them in the early 80's and my grandfather used to watch Showtime After Dark which was basically softcore and they had no problem with us watching. I remember one time Eddie Murphy's Delirious was on and my grandmother made us turn the channel because he was using bad language.
 
Upvote 0
Muck;1938206; said:
I think a PG-13 rating revolves more around a lack of nudity.

Shooting people in the face is fine for pre-teens...but god forbid they see some boobies.

And profanity. Apparently you can only say fuck once, which was used when The Rock said "Get the fuck out of my way" when he was being introduced. :lol: Poor placement of the word fuck.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top