buckeyesin07
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
Woody1968;2027065; said:Do you even read the threads before you post in them?
The way your own posts contradict one another, I don't think you even reread your own posts before you post again.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Woody1968;2027065; said:Do you even read the threads before you post in them?
buckeyesin07;2027532; said:Maybe, in hindsight. Bet you wouldn't be saying that, though, if Brax hadn't pulled the game winner out of his hat.
Woody1968;2027815; said:The offense didn't give up two quick touchdowns in the 4th quarter. It isn't like playcalling put us behind.
buckeyesin07;2027538; said:The way your own posts contradict one another, I don't think you even reread your own posts before you post again.
buckeyesin07;2027823; said:What happened between those two late TDs? Oh, right--a three and out due to unimaginative play calling when one first down would have iced the game. Thanks for making my point for me.
MD Buckeye;1962975; said:http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp
Total Offense Rankings
2010: 20th
2009: 68th
2008: 76th
2007: 62nd
2006: 26th
2005: 32nd
2004: 98th
2003: 93rd
2002: 70th
2001: 65th
2000: 59th
TresselstillownsTSUN;2027904; said:Bolls has never been the most innovative guy, but people crushing this guy right now need to chill. His freshmen QB steps into sacks, and struggles with blitzes. Typical of a freshmen. Braxton is gonna be a mega star, but it takes time.
While I'm ready for a change after this season as well, I will say that I saw a few first down pass attempts. If I recall correctly, those drives ended in punts. And that, to me, us the real problem. I don't think play calling was problematic at all today, but execution sometimes was. Now, if you want to argue that our execution against an inferior Indiana team should be better, I could probably get with that and understand that this also falls upon the coaching staff.ysubuck;2027910; said:Agreed on Braxton.
But the fact remains that the two things that Bollman is responsible for, the O line and the offensive play calling, are the consistent weak links over the Jim Bollman era. Indiana should have never been in this game. Yes they have a funky offense, but an Ohio State football team should be able to drum up some plays to score some points on a pathetic Indiana defense.
They rolled on two possessions because Indiana was gassed because they have no depth. Another game that should have been a tune up, a chance to get the 2s in and get some game experience and they couldn't. They couldn't because the offense was stinking up the joint and allowing Indiana to stay in the ball game.
EDIT Please don't get me wrong. A W is a W, especially this season. But a team as inferior as Indiana should have been put away by half time with the 2s being able to get some shots at playing. I just don't think that this offensive staff even considers that. They never change anything or try to adjust anything. Run, run pass. Run run pass. Punt sometimes. Field goal. Touchdown. Never a twist or turn just to throw the defense off. It will be truly interesting to see what a new OC brings to this young team.
matcar;2027941; said:While I'm ready for a change after this season as well, I will say that I saw a few first down pass attempts. If I recall correctly, those drives ended in punts. And that, to me, us the real problem. I don't think play calling was problematic at all today, but execution sometimes was. Now, if you want to argue that our execution against an inferior Indiana team should be better, I could probably get with that and understand that this also falls upon the coaching staff.
TresselstillownsTSUN;2027904; said:Bolls has never been the most innovative guy, but people crushing this guy right now need to chill. His freshmen QB steps into sacks, and struggles with blitzes. Typical of a freshmen. Braxton is gonna be a mega star, but it takes time.