For my most recent
post in the stats thread I compiled a simple, albeit enormous spreadsheet. That sheet revealed a thing or two about the upcoming opponent.
While Ohio State has significant variability in performance quarter-to-quarter (more than most teams but about the same as many Buckeye teams, maddeningly enough), Iowa is a mixed bag. Their running game performance on both sides of the ball is more consistent than Ohio State's (though not as good), but their throw game is absolutely
Jekyll and Hyde.
Like the Buckeyes, the Iowa first quarter is worse than the second and third for their rushing offense. They are 61st in the nation in YPC in the first quarter (the Buckeyes are 97th), but rise moderately to 22nd in the second and 23rd in the third (the Buckeyes soar to 2nd and 9th respectively). What is vastly different is the 4th quarter. For the final stanza, the Hawkeyes have had to keep their starters in and lean on the worn down opponent in order to close out games while the Buckeyes have played backups for almost the entirety of every 4th quarter. The result is that Iowa has their best rushing performance in the fourth (10th in the nation in YPC), while the Buckeyes drop to their worst performance (66th).
Both teams are more consistent on rushing defense, but unlike the Buckeyes, the Hawkeyes are better in the first stanza than in the second. They start out 20th in the nation then drop to 53rd. For one reason or another they zoom up to 12th place in the third quarter and keep that momentum going for 9th place in the 4th. It does not bode well for the Hawkeyes that their worst quarter (the second) matches up with the best quarter for the Buckeye ground game (#1 in FBS).
The Hawkeyes also have their worst quarter on pass defense when the Buckeye passing attack is at its best (in the third), but the big story is just how inconsistent the Iowa pass defense has been this year. Iowa's FBS rank in pass efficiency by quarter:
1) 3
2) 103
3) 103
4) 43
Not a typo. They are third in the nation in the first quarter in defensive PE. Then drop to
ONE HUNDRED and third for the second and third quarters. So while Iowa's overall rank in pass efficiency is middling (54th), they get there by being good in the first and downright awful thereafter. Now try to cover this SET (Smith, Egbuka & Tate) of receivers. Yikes.
This brings us to the passing offense. Ohio State fans are familiar with average or worse quarterbacks having the game of their lives against the Buckeyes. It happens all the time. But I would not worry about it on Saturday, and not just because Cade McNamara is woefully inconsistent.
But inconsistent he is. When he does get hot, it has only ever been in the third quarter. In that stanza he is 12th in the nation in PE. Iowa's PE is 125th in the first, 127th in the second, and 90th in the fourth. So one good to very good quarter and three quarters of absolutely terrible.
It's not just inconsistency. His performance is fragile. Against the tomato cans he's played (Illinois State and Troy) Cade has done very well. Against the other teams, he's had PE of 59.72 and 85.31. Granted, those two opponents are ranked first and second respectively in defensive PE in the nation (Iowa State and Minnesota), but does anyone really believe that either of those teams has a top ten passing defense? The best PE against Minnesota this year was posted by Alex Orji. Seriously. You think Ohio State's schedule has been bad up till now? Look at the Cyclones' and Gophers' slates (but only if you have a strong stomach).
So why do I say I wouldn't worry? We've seen bad quarterbacks turn into Joe Namath before. The reason is that the book is out on Cade McNamara. Pressure him and he folds like origami.
According to PFF, as reported by
SI, "he has completed 54 of his 76 passes for 506 yards. However, when he's under pressure, he is just 10-for-26 for 82 yards, a touchdown, and an interception." So under pressure his PE is 69.954. And the world knows it. Jim Knowles knows it. Jack Sawyer knows it. Tyleik Williams, now fully rested and healthy, knows it.
I would say "good luck Iowa", because you'll need it, but I wouldn't mean it