I suppose I don't quite understand the lump-sum hatred of the mid-major teams on here. Does anyone care to articulate it?
I understand the anti-Boise State crowd. They talk a lot of shit, don't back up their claims on the anytime-anywhere scheduling moniker, play a 1-2 game season then sit back and watch.
I don't understand the anti-TCU crowd. The Rose Bowl is the organization that changed their contracts from congressional pressures (too much of an anti-trust issue I thought?). I mean, the Rose Bowl was already desecrated from the recent BCS history during their national title years: Texas-Michigan, Texas-USC, Miami-Nebraska. Not to mention that the Rose Bowl may/will be forced to take the Big East champion or Notre Dame the next time that the Big Ten or Pac-10 champs qualify for the National Title game.
I read you guys disregard/belittle their football programs because they bitch about the major programs and their place in major FBS football. I truly don't understand why you put so much into it though. Many of the mid-major programs play great football; games that are often more enjoyable to watch than the ACC, the Big East and many other lower-tier match-ups from the other conferences. I'm not saying that it always happens, in general their schedules are weak. But Boise State, TCU, Utah, BYU and a few others make for some intriguing Bowl Games and non-conference match-ups.
I know many of you have indicated that you don't/won't watch it but that doesn't matter because you seem to give them a lot of negative reviews regardless. I suppose my point is this: can you not enjoy the football they play without commenting on how dumb their merit/resume to the national title is?
On a STRICTLY football game basis, I would love for Ohio State to play Boise State or TCU on occasion during our non-conference match-up and I know it would improve our strength of schedule. I understand that football politics don't make much sense for the Buckeyes to schedule that, but still, it would be an intriguing match-up.