Game Thread Illinois 28, Ohio State 21 (final)

[PogueMahone]

I think that if the Bucks had trouble with Juice, had they met Oregon in the NC Dixon would have killed them. Better to lose like this than get embarrassed in the NC again.

I was actually just thinking that. Let's be glad the D may have gotten their worst performance of the year out of their system now, and hopefully not in the bowl game.

 

[NJ-Buckeye]

Is it one lost challenge per game, or per half?

I thought it was per half... but the clip I pasted was right from ncaa.org

 

[CausticMick]

Does anyone know if any of our coaches have access to the TV broadcast of the game to help inform these types of decisions? I know that either Bollman or Heacock is our eye in the sky, and I wonder if those folks can see the play/replays on TV.

I don't know for sure, but I'd guess it's not like the NFL where they have someone on the replays on every play. I could certainly be wrong about that, though.

 

[MililaniBuckeye]

You did'nt see those jackass Illini players stomping on Block O?

I had walked away before that happened. Why do fucking punk players feel they have to do that shit? Really.

Hey, Illinois, you think you're hot shit because you played the game of your lives? Talk shit when you're 10-1, if you ever accomplish that in the next millenium...

 

[NFBuck]

The worst part of all of this is that I can't have a drink for about another five hours. That's just cruel.

 

[Bill Lucas]

Is this still the current rule? If so, there is a challenge process but it must be initiated by a timeout.

"

RULE 12 / INSTANT REPLAY FR-147​

1. There is reasonable evidence to believe an error was made in the
initial on-field ruling.
2. The play is reviewable.
3. Any reversal of an on-field ruling, which would result from
indisputable video evidence, would have a direct, competitive impact
on the game.
b. The head coach of either team may request that the game be stopped and
a play be reviewed by challenging the on-field ruling.
1. A coach initiates this challenge by taking a team time out before
the ball is next put in play and informing the referee that he is
challenging the ruling of the previous play. The head coach who has
challenged the original ruling is not permitted any other challenge
during the game.
2. After a review has been completed, if the on-field ruling is reversed,
that team?s time out will not be charged.
3. After a review has been completed, if the on-field ruling is not
reversed, the charged team time out counts as one of the three
permitted that team for that half.
4. A Head Coach may not challenge a ruling in which the game was stopped
and a decision has already been made by the Replay Official.
5. If a Head Coach requests a team time out to challenge an on-field
ruling and the play being challenged is not reviewable, the time out
shall count as one of the three permitted his team during that half of
the game. If all team timeouts have been used, a delay penalty will
be assessed.
6. A Head Coach may not challenge an on-field ruling if all the team?s
timeouts have been used for that half.​

7. Each Head Coach shall be permitted one challenge per game."

 

[CausticMick]

What was with all the 3 man defensive line sets today? every time we came with that we got burned by the run

We did run a significant amount of three down linemen but brought someone off the edge nearly every play to give a four-man front feel. However, it always left us with 2 LBs. That hurt.

 

[NFBuck]

Zook Juiced us. I can't believe it's taken that long for someone to type this.:tongue2:

 

[Bill Lucas]

One challenge per game, not per half.

 

[buckeyemania11]

THEY COULD NOT CHALLENGE THE CALL

the player was RULED DOWN BY THE REF which is an unreviewable play

 

[Bucksfan4life]

Hopefully LSU loses tonight so those analyst will shut up.

 

[djsm1012]

To LA-Tech? I can't see that happening.

 

[BengalsAndBucks]

It seemed like all day we ran 3-3-5 or 4-2-5. Why? They are an option offense, you want as many bodies at the line of scrimmage to stop it. Also, I was in the stands and wasn't keying on Malcolm, but it really looked like he was getting just destroyed on the play-action.

 

[hdcolumbus]

Next year? Let's talk about next week.
:osu:

Read my previous posts.... Next week is THE most important game of THIS season (after this L); however, any tOSU fan can dream about the promise of what could happen with an almost entirely returning #1 defense can bode for the future... Granted, they got the shit kicked out of them today, but to be ranked the #1 D made up of entirely sophs and juniors can only mean great things for the program's future (if they all return).

 

[OCBucksFan]

It seemed like all day we ran 3-3-5 or 4-2-5. Why? They are an option offense, you want as many bodies at the line of scrimmage to stop it. Also, I was in the stands and wasn't keying on Malcolm, but it really looked like he was getting just destroyed on the play-action.

We stuffed the box in the beginning of the game and they burned us with the pass.