You were the one who brought McCarron into this convo to justify why Golson would be a Heisman poster child next year, even though the two players are nothing alike.
You were mystified why the QB of a preseason title contender would be a heisman candidate, so I brought up McCarron, who had pretty average numbers the year before.
McCarron - 202 yds per game in '11
Golson - 203 yds per game in '12 (including injury limited UM game, excluding missed BYU game)
Neither are deserving heisman contenders but the heisman stereotypes inflate their chances to be on the list.
You don't need my response here, because you are doing a pretty good job tearing down your own strawman.
Of course. It's always easier to say 'your argument is invalid' than prove it wrong, especially when the challenge is to prove YOUR argument of his stats being good.
So Thomas = Barner = James. Got it. I'm going to stop whatever I'm doing and start making the Dontre Wilson for 2016 Heisman posters.
Yeah, I'd switch to that strawman too after the 'not hearing much about Barner being a candidate' doozy.
Thomas got some Heisman chatter before this season (top-12 IIRC according to vegas odds). With Barner's high profile season and Oregon's title chase, Thomas will get more run for 2013.
Anyways, I'm still maintaining that Braxton Miller will be the 2013 Heisman favorite. I hope that's not too much to ask about here.
Something I never argued with, but good work on the victim routine. Also neat since this little rabbit trail started with you finding fault with a flippant list of guys in the 2013 heisman race.