-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter smithlabs
- Start date
soul....i dont expect much from a guy with less than 200 posts, but give me a fucking break. you're recommending a guy with less than 1000 posts for the florida job? I dont care if he won back to back NCs on NCAA 2005 and back to back #1 recruiting classes.....HE HAS NO CONTACTS
Upvote
0
buckeye68
Senior
Mr. Smithlabs, what you've just posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this board is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
:2004:
:2004:
Last edited:
Upvote
0
souL
I.bulldoze
{serious mode]
My records for 2004 (haven't got into 2005 much)
Sim
Wins in a row: 128
NCs in a row: 9
Heismans in a row: 4
Win%(full 60 year franchise): .931%
NCAA records broken: 18 (including Rushing TD)
Done with OSU so it was unfair
{/serious mode]
I need to nominate myself... I'm just working on my post count. Just remember; Joe Paterno didn't have ANY posts when he took over at PSU!
My records for 2004 (haven't got into 2005 much)
Sim
Wins in a row: 128
NCs in a row: 9
Heismans in a row: 4
Win%(full 60 year franchise): .931%
NCAA records broken: 18 (including Rushing TD)
Done with OSU so it was unfair
{/serious mode]
I need to nominate myself... I'm just working on my post count. Just remember; Joe Paterno didn't have ANY posts when he took over at PSU!
Upvote
0
Originally Posted by Buckeyeskickbuttocks
Lightning.... I'll refer you to my post count. I clearly know more than you.
Am I the only one that thinks these guys are compensating for something? Obviously one can learn a lot from spending time on these forums and participating in the discussions, but the claim that your wisdom is equivalent to your post count is ridiculous.
That's like saying that smithlabs would get smarter once he had posted retarded crap like this many more times.
Also, NCAA 2005 is a phenomenal game, but it really isn't difficult at all to continuously win titles, heismans, etc. I know a lot of people who are horrible at the game that are capable of doing this.
Lightning.... I'll refer you to my post count. I clearly know more than you.
Am I the only one that thinks these guys are compensating for something? Obviously one can learn a lot from spending time on these forums and participating in the discussions, but the claim that your wisdom is equivalent to your post count is ridiculous.
That's like saying that smithlabs would get smarter once he had posted retarded crap like this many more times.
Also, NCAA 2005 is a phenomenal game, but it really isn't difficult at all to continuously win titles, heismans, etc. I know a lot of people who are horrible at the game that are capable of doing this.
Upvote
0
CrabMan
Heisman
Uh, yes you are. Before passing judgement on fellow BP posters, maybe you should spend some time browsing through the forums. If you had you would find that bkb's post is in jest and he's really making fun of a dumbass from bucknuts.BuckeyeFROMscUM said:
I'll make it easy for you...
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6148
Carry on....
Last edited:
Upvote
0
smithlabs
Heisman
A bit late for that.
So alternate delay of game and false starts. It doesn't really matter which penalty you commit as long as you don't snap the ball.
Why exactly would they punt? If multiple penalties are allowed than it would still be first down. Repeat penalties until defense makes a mistake. It is a statistical necessity that the defense will commint a penalty given enough time. Perhaps they get mad at the cheap shots on false starts. Perhaps you can catch them with too many on the field during a substitution if you change your personnel. Perhaps you can draw them off sides with a hard count. Perhaps they just fall over laughing when your snap count is "hut 1, hut 2, hut 2 1/2, hut 2 3/4, hut 2 7/8, hut 3 15/16 ... Perhaps they flinch when you line up quickly and make the lineman stay in a three point stance for a full 25 seconds. I think the dumbest thing I have heard is your idea to punt of first down.
Thank you for the answer. I thought I found a loophole but it has been closed in Article 3, section b. I have been asking this question for some time and I have never heard that answer. Usually people try to ignore the idea at first because it is so far out of the box. However, without Article 3, section b taking multiple fouls that can be penalized only by havling the distance to the goal line make logical sense.
If the team was playing in their underware there would be better places to stamp PUSSY.Perhaps I should talk about a specific case. Suppose the ball is touching your own goal line because you have just made a goal line stand on 4th and inches. Would you try and draw the defense offsides? The possible benifit is a 5 yard penalty that results in a first and 5 on the 5 yard line. The possible cost is a zero yard penalty because you can't possibly move any closer to the goal. In this case it makes perfect sense to risk a zero yard penalty for a chance of a first and 5 from the 5 yard line. Do teams ever do things like this? Are they pussies? Didn't New England do something simular last year during the playoffs? They had 4th and less then five from the 35 yard line. The lined up to kick a field goal and had a lineman make an unusual but legal shift. The oppents jumped offsides because of the shift and New England got the first down. I don't think they would have kick a field goal. I think they would have taken a delay of game penalty if the opponent hadn't jumped offsides. They were just trying to draw a penalty, those pussy world champs that they are. The next part of my question is if you don't get the penalty on the first play do you repeat the process until a penalty is called? I have learned today that the answer is no because of Article 3, section b.
Smithlabs
Upvote
0
