Giovanni Strassini: A Football Fantasy

Work in progress

 

biatch provided a link to show i am not convicted, stop lying
the case i refer to was never adjudicated, it was voluntarily dismissed, so it is not on the net, dummy
as for the proof, it is sent to a second party now, and hopefully he will post about it.

Giovanni Strassini, convicted criminal. Wire fraud.

 

ok so giovanni sent me his proof.

i will not share it as i am a man of my word but will offer some basic comments.

he can prove that he had his case against him from the banks dismissed in North Carolina. that is definitely true.

is that his only case, i can't say as i don't practice law and don't have a manner of searching the court records in NC.

i can also say that the banks made the motion to dismiss the case, but it doesn't say why. the banks dropped the case for sure though.

is this definitive proof of all his claims outside being an AA TE at OSU true, not really. does it lend reasonable doubt, yea it does a little.

more paperwork or a good link to search the NC court records would help flush this out more fully.

if giovanni sends more, i will look at it too. if anyone has a good link for the NC courts or a historical offender search for NC (maybe my link earlier was historical, haven't checked and i am hitting the titty bar soon so i won't be tonight until 2:30 or 3am if at all).

the closest there is to dirt on this guy from what i have received is he did register the jds consultants website or has been hacked and someone used his account to set up that website. i really only can link him to the registration of JDS consultants though, nothing more.

honestly, that link proves little to me at this point.

probably not what giovanni wanted to hear or the masses that want him to fry for alleged lies. all i can say is the documents do not seem remotely forged to me after opening them up in GIMP (linux photoshop) and he has had the case dismissed at one point in time. he is connected to the website registration of JDS but again that doesn't prove anything else.

does this mean he is falsely accused, no not really. i would need more info for that as his proof only proves one case and again, i can't say there are or are not other cases. he is telling the truth about that case being dismissed though, at least at the point in time that the paperwork he sent me was created.

not sure if this helps anyone or not, but i would say what i say, while incomplete in clearing his name, does show that he had a case dismissed against him by the banks. it does connect him to JDS website registration, but that doesn't prove any crime that i am aware of

the mystery continues. titty bar is calling me. going to pee and clean up and then check back in before leaving.

I owe the guy an apology for the attack on that case regarding the banks. Regarding the bank issue, I admit that I am wrong & therefore apologize.

 

ok so giovanni sent me his proof.

i will not share it as i am a man of my word but will offer some basic comments.

he can prove that he had his case against him from the banks dismissed in North Carolina. that is definitely true.

is that his only case, i can't say as i don't practice law and don't have a manner of searching the court records in NC.

i can also say that the banks made the motion to dismiss the case, but it doesn't say why. the banks dropped the case for sure though.

is this definitive proof of all his claims outside being an AA TE at OSU true, not really. does it lend reasonable doubt, yea it does a little.

more paperwork or a good link to search the NC court records would help flush this out more fully.

if giovanni sends more, i will look at it too. if anyone has a good link for the NC courts or a historical offender search for NC (maybe my link earlier was historical, haven't checked and i am hitting the titty bar soon so i won't be tonight until 2:30 or 3am if at all).

the closest there is to dirt on this guy from what i have received is he did register the jds consultants website or has been hacked and someone used his account to set up that website. i really only can link him to the registration of JDS consultants though, nothing more.

honestly, that link proves little to me at this point.

probably not what giovanni wanted to hear or the masses that want him to fry for alleged lies. all i can say is the documents do not seem remotely forged to me after opening them up in GIMP (linux photoshop) and he has had the case dismissed at one point in time. he is connected to the website registration of JDS but again that doesn't prove anything else.

does this mean he is falsely accused, no not really. i would need more info for that as his proof only proves one case and again, i can't say there are or are not other cases. he is telling the truth about that case being dismissed though, at least at the point in time that the paperwork he sent me was created.

not sure if this helps anyone or not, but i would say what i say, while incomplete in clearing his name, does show that he had a case dismissed against him by the banks. it does connect him to JDS website registration, but that doesn't prove any crime that i am aware of

the mystery continues. titty bar is calling me. going to pee and clean up and then check back in before leaving.

Please answer this, was this some random identity theft case (if even that) or does it directly relate to the John D Strassini stuff posted?

In other words, does it just say the case against him was dropped (which could be for anything), or is there a direct correlation to the stuff posted here.

Just having some random cased dropped doesn't prove anything. I am willing to bet there are a lot of felons that had cases dropped at some point for many reasons.

BTW...the appeal case provided earlier was for someone already convicted. So obviously it does not relate to that.

 

ok so giovanni sent me his proof.

i will not share it as i am a man of my word but will offer some basic comments.

he can prove that he had his case against him from the banks dismissed in North Carolina. that is definitely true.

is that his only case, i can't say as i don't practice law and don't have a manner of searching the court records in NC.

i can also say that the banks made the motion to dismiss the case, but it doesn't say why. the banks dropped the case for sure though.

is this definitive proof of all his claims outside being an AA TE at OSU true, not really. does it lend reasonable doubt, yea it does a little.

more paperwork or a good link to search the NC court records would help flush this out more fully.

if giovanni sends more, i will look at it too. if anyone has a good link for the NC courts or a historical offender search for NC (maybe my link earlier was historical, haven't checked and i am hitting the titty bar soon so i won't be tonight until 2:30 or 3am if at all).

the closest there is to dirt on this guy from what i have received is he did register the jds consultants website or has been hacked and someone used his account to set up that website. i really only can link him to the registration of JDS consultants though, nothing more.

honestly, that link proves little to me at this point.

probably not what giovanni wanted to hear or the masses that want him to fry for alleged lies. all i can say is the documents do not seem remotely forged to me after opening them up in GIMP (linux photoshop) and he has had the case dismissed at one point in time. he is connected to the website registration of JDS but again that doesn't prove anything else.

does this mean he is falsely accused, no not really. i would need more info for that as his proof only proves one case and again, i can't say there are or are not other cases. he is telling the truth about that case being dismissed though, at least at the point in time that the paperwork he sent me was created.

not sure if this helps anyone or not, but i would say what i say, while incomplete in clearing his name, does show that he had a case dismissed against him by the banks. it does connect him to JDS website registration, but that doesn't prove any crime that i am aware of

the mystery continues. titty bar is calling me. going to pee and clean up and then check back in before leaving.

i said the fraud name was used to perpetrate the acts the bank accused him of. after years they found my name and attempted to add my name as an alias and used those other names to commit the acts against the bank.
it has the case number, the names on the case, my attorney and the banks lead attorney. they were told to dismiss it because it was not me. a VOLUNTARY dismissal comes when you feel you cannot convict, or the judge tells you to do it as in this case, the papers filed originally by the bank did not have my name, they attempted to add it much later. biatch can find that out when the courts open after Memorial Day. i will let him ask me for what he needs, it is filed in court as i said.
thanks for that help and enjoy the tt bar

 

Please answer this, was this some random identity theft case (if even that) or does it directly relate to the John D Strassini stuff posted?

In other words, does it just say the case against him was dropped (which could be for anything), or is there a direct correlation to the stuff posted here.

Just having some random cased dropped doesn't prove anything. I am willing to bet there are a lot of felons that had cases dropped at some point for many reasons.

BTW...the appeal case provided earlier was for someone already convicted. So obviously it does not relate to that.

Exactly. It actually fits the pattern. It's something that is "official" but it could be for anything. However, someone who hasn't found all of the other crap might not be able to make the leap as quickly (since we all have had several days to figure it out). That confusion/misinformation would give this fraud time to do whatever it is he's trying to do.

 

Giovanni Strassini, convicted criminal. Wire fraud.

not true, enough misinformation about me ok

 

not true, enough misinformation about me ok

You haven't shown anyone anything that disproves what has been found on the Internet.

 

You haven't shown anyone anything that disproves what has been found on the Internet.

lmao- you will see soon., biatch is playing it close, when he gets more info he will say more. that case is 100% refuting the fraud names as me. the banks tried and failed. as i said before, they have more money and people hired to find proof. they could not because it was not me. carry on mike mcneil. you have another few days to lie about me.

 

lmao- you will see soon., biatch is playing it close, when he gets more info he will say more. that case is 100% refuting the fraud names as me. the banks tried and failed. as i said before, they have more money and people hired to find proof. they could not because it was not me. carry on mike mcneil. you have another few days to lie about me.

Yeah, but the appellate case provided earlier was for a man already convicted and sentenced. What is the correlation between your documents and that case?

 

Please answer this, was this some random identity theft case (if even that) or does it directly relate to the John D Strassini stuff posted?

In other words, does it just say the case against him was dropped (which could be for anything), or is there a direct correlation to the stuff posted here.

Just having some random cased dropped doesn't prove anything. I am willing to bet there are a lot of felons that had cases dropped at some point for many reasons.

BTW...the appeal case provided earlier was for someone already convicted. So obviously it does not relate to that.

it is actually a case against giovanni and they list the john d strassini as an alias not the other way around. so what giovanni says in the post after yours does jive but he phrased it poorly (go figure).

you are right though, having one case dismissed at one point in time doesn't prove no crime ever, but it does lend some credence to what he says. no clearwater revival to go with that credence, but some credence tapes in the car for sure.

there is not enough to say either way what is going on honestly, but there is a kernel of truth to giovanni in the documents he provided. they don't look to be remotely forged and there is other info there to investigate further.

if someone could get me a link to search the north carolina court records that would help. if giovanni had more paperwork, that could help his case too.

the one thing i don't get is i have no idea why giovanni wouldn't share the one document. sure it doesn't prove everything, but it can only help him from what i see.

 

Yeah, but the appellate case provided earlier was for a man already convicted and sentenced. What is the correlation between your documents and that case?

can you PM or post it here so i don't have to search it all down.

 

Exactly. It actually fits the pattern. It's something that is "official" but it could be for anything. However, someone who hasn't found all of the other crap might not be able to make the leap as quickly (since we all have had several days to figure it out). That confusion/misinformation would give this fraud time to do whatever it is he's trying to do.

it does have the case # on it though and lists his name as giovanni and the others as the aka.

is there more out there, i ain't searching the 110 pages of this thread for it and i haven't found where to search all the court records yet but i will.

 

Yeah, but the appellate case provided earlier was for a man already convicted and sentenced. What is the correlation between your documents and that case?

the banks that were defrauded, in the names you mentioned, and that guy was convicted and the banks came back in a civil case to try and collect the money civilly. they could not find the guy with the name he used, so when they searched they came up with my name. in the case i sent to biatch, they made a motion to ADD my name and that i used those other names to commit the crimes against them. that is when i went and got the fingerprint statements and blood work done, to show that the guy that did those things, and all his info was in the files of the fbi, that it was not me. the banks still went forward anyway. they were trying to get their money back. biatch has the dismissal, with all the names used here and mine, and the fraud names that got convicted, were NOT me. the only "body" the banks had was mine, and since the same last name was used, they attempted to do what mike mcneil and others on this site have done, say it was me.
the court/judge told the banks attorney they had the wrong guy and to dismiss the case or lose my counter claim.
2 days later, VOLUNTARY dismissal. that is how, 100% court proven, the fraud guy is NOT me. beyond any doubt. the banks tried to prove that i was the fraud guy, and lost.

 

me, i have had enough of this tonight.

i am going to go look at some strange tits then take the old lady home after work and get some.

enjoy the evening all.

 

can you PM or post it here so i don't have to search it all down.

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/Unpublished/994654.U.pdf

You will note that the name of the builders are Elite Builders and JDS Builders. You say you can link him to registering JDS Consultants. When was this done? The crimes in the appeal case were mid 90's, and I don't think there is any internet connection unless you say otherwise.

First of all, there is a John D Strassini. That is known. He appeared in court, was convicted, and sentenced. I can only assume he served some time. So this as not identity theft. There is an actual JD Strassini that is an excon who lived in North Carolina and committed fraud.

So there is not identity theft here if JD Strassini is involved. At best, mistaken identity. Now, what is the deal with JDS Consultants registered by Giovanni? Is there actual proof he registered that name? If so, pretty amazing that someone can find a guy with a very similar name (coincidentally in the same area), hack them, and start a business under his name.

On top of all of that, If Giovanni did prove that he does not have an alias as John D Strassini it would be redacted from court records.

I know this pisses off Giovanni, but I have actually been pretty fair concerning this whole criminal activity angle. As for acting as an Ohio State TE, Wiki, the alumni club, Twitter, and many other things, his reasons are beyond reasonable doubt. This whole thing has no bearing on that.