• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Gene Smith (Former AD, ‘10 AD of the Year, '13 NAAC Organizational Leadership Award)

buxfan4life;2068654; said:
This post was bumped once before, and I think it needs to be bumped again. The bolded is spot on for what we witnessed this past year, in my IMO.

Revisionist history. Gene Smith was a rising star at the time hired and a leader on the Committee of Infractions..."Driver" is a freaking joke. It makes me sick to read post like "Driver's"...sick and hurts my heart. It is easy for all of us to use negative information to confirm our own beliefs. Should Gene Smith be fired for what happened at OSU? Yes, probably, but don't use the failings of the AD and the inter-collegiate athletic system to legitimize your biases.

GO Bucks!!!
 
Upvote 0
Ohio State AD Gene Smith talks about NCAA ruling, didn't think bowl ban was possible
Published: Tuesday, December 20, 2011
By Doug Lesmerises, The Plain Dealer

COLUMBUS - Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith told the Plain Dealer in an interview today that there was a miscalculation by the school in not anticipating a bowl ban from the NCAA, but even given that knowledge, he wanted this year's team to experience a bowl, so he accepts the reality that the ban will come in 2012.

"Had this team come to me and said we don't want to play in a bowl at the end of the season, that would have factored in, but that's not what we had here," Smith said. "These young men fought through adversity. I know that Buckeye Nation is all about next year and looking forward to winning a national championship, and that is right.

"But when you think about Michael Brewster and Andrew Sweat and those young people, you don't want to deny them that opportunity. We have young people who have earned that right to play in a bowl. I know our fans want to see us in a BCS bowl and winning national championships, and they are a great support group, but at the end of the year these young men earned this right to play in a Jan. 2 game."

So Smith said self-imposing a bowl ban for 2011 never crossed his mind, believing strongly that a bowl ban would not be in line based on past precedent.

"I never thought about this year," Smith said. "I was pretty confident, frankly, when you look at the way we looked at the facts and considered things. That's why I'm so surprised and disappointed. But when you looked at it the way we did, we didn't think it was possible."

The NCAA cited two cases from 2002 and 2003 in its decision to impose a bowl ban, factoring the school's failure to monitor to charge in with its status as a repeat violator under NCAA rules, and the fact that suspended players were allowed to play in the Sugar Bowl last year while then-coach Jim Tressel hid his knowledge of NCAA violations.

Smith said Ohio State's research focused on more recent cases, and the school did not expect cases from eight and nine years ago to be used in the NCAA's reasoning.

Asked whether he was worried about his job at Ohio State, given the last 12 months and the outcome of the NCAA case, Smith said, "President Gee has been very supportive of me and I come to work every day and do the best job I can. The president makes that ultimate decision, and he's been very supportive of me."

Smith said he talked with new football coach Urban Meyer at length today about the ruling. Smith said of next season "we're making sure that we're moving forward the right way. We have 12 outstanding games next year, eight at home, so he's excited about that still."

http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2011/12/ohio_state_ad_gene_smith_talks.html
 
Upvote 0
Doug Lesmerises


Gene Smith said he didn't think bowl ban was possible, but even in hindsight, willing to give up '12 bowl to give this team a bowl
Unreal. It is astonishing how clueless this guy is. He's beginning to make St. Bill of Ann Arbor (God bless that magnificent sonofabitch) look like Andy Geiger.
 
Upvote 0
Personally, I think the NCAA wanted to send a message here (without the bowl ban, OSU basically walks after the ruling), but it's astonishing how many times Gene can top himself.
 
Upvote 0
Bucklion;2068700; said:
Yeah, he'll show...he can't help himself, and he has thoroughly convinced himself he has done nothing wrong at all.

He might show, but Channel 4 (WCMH) reported that he won't be introducing Coach Knight at halftime.

But who knows, because everything Gene Smith has done of late has been wrong (and he might just go out there).

If you saw today's comments from Smith to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, he's inept and a change of leadership is past due.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;2068713; said:
Personally, I think the NCAA wanted to send a message here (without the bowl ban, OSU basically walks after the ruling), but it's astonishing how many times Gene can top himself.

Sorry, I have to.

You said the magic word of "Top"

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIiMt9GgyDY"]Best of the Office: Stanley Yells at Michael - YouTube[/ame]
 
Upvote 0
Boo his ass off the court tonight.

I haven't read the whole thread, so cooler heads may advise him not to show up.

Of course, he probably has no idea how pissed off people are right now.

He has to go.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
Buckskin86;2068704; said:

I never thought about it like banning Sweat/Brewster from a bowl game this year versus next years seniors from next years bowl. Immediately after the bowl ban report was released I had a conversation with a couple friends, and we talked about how it was an epic mistake to not to self-impose the bowl ban for this year. However, Gene's comments got me thinking that I never really considered the current team and all the adversity they experienced. It would be tough to then tell Brewster and current seniors that they can't go to a bowl after all the adversity experienced this year. In contrast, IMHO I think it would have been beneficial to go through the bowl ban this year so that we could be free from major sanctions and move forward going next year.
 
Upvote 0
LiveForPeace;2068737; said:
I never thought about it like banning Sweat/Brewster from a bowl game this year versus next years seniors from next years bowl. Immediately after the bowl ban report was released I had a conversation with a couple friends, and we talked about how it was an epic mistake to not to self-impose the bowl ban for this year. However, Gene's comments got me thinking that I never really considered the current team and all the adversity they experienced. It would be tough to then tell Brewster and current seniors that they can't go to a bowl after all the adversity experienced this year. In contrast, IMHO I think it would have been beneficial to go through the bowl ban this year so that we could be free from major sanctions and move forward going next year.

Why wouldn't it make more sense for this year's team to get the ban? The guys that caused this mess are seniors on this team. They are the guys who should be serving whatever consequence was put forth by the NCAA. Yeah, it would be tough to tell these guys, but what are you going to tell the guys who are back next year? What about the recruits?

Gene Smith really thought this one through didn't he? Nice job. Worth every penny.:shake:
 
Upvote 0
LiveForPeace;2068737; said:
I never thought about it like banning Sweat/Brewster from a bowl game this year versus next years seniors from next years bowl. Immediately after the bowl ban report was released I had a conversation with a couple friends, and we talked about how it was an epic mistake to not to self-impose the bowl ban for this year. However, Gene's comments got me thinking that I never really considered the current team and all the adversity they experienced. It would be tough to then tell Brewster and current seniors that they can't go to a bowl after all the adversity experienced this year. In contrast, IMHO I think it would have been beneficial to go through the bowl ban this year so that we could be free from major sanctions and move forward going next year.

I understand what you are saying, but do you realize by banning OSU from a bowl next year is ruining the Senior year of the Juniors who had nothing to do with this (obviously not including Hall and Howard)!!! I would rather punish a couple than a whole Senior class. I would have been pissed off if someone would have taken away my chance to win Conference and National Titles my Senior year. Your Senior year means more than any other year.
 
Upvote 0
I'm curious how much longer Gene Smith remains under tOSU's employ. He cannot be long for that job. I don't see how he can be. He has bumbled this thing from the get-go. Now he's out there in his best self-preservation form. Just unbelievable. Gee should also be under some serious fire along with Doug Archie.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top