Gatorubet
Loathing All Things Georgia
The Gator Bowl, with tOSU playing Florida, is ranked as the 11th best of the 35 bowl games. From CollegeFootballNews.com.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gatorubet;2059169; said:The Gator Bowl, with tOSU playing Florida, is ranked as the 11th best of the 35 bowl games. From CollegeFootballNews.com.
Urban won two national titles and rescued you from the Ron Zook era.Gatorubet;2059163; said:FYI, reported that Urban and Boom had a less than pleasant phone call about M&M's departure, that resulted in Urban hanging up on him. Don't know if that is true, but several sources are talking about it. I think that Boom might be trying to use the departure of the old Meyer staff as a rallying point for the troops - trying to establish an "us versus them" deal, with Urban and the staff who leave being framed as the bad guys. Not a bad ploy. A "we'll show them! " type thing may be what he needs to focus the team and bring them together - a sort of final catharsis of the Meyer era and move on to his.
Or, just more nonsense to try to hype an otherwise lackluster 6-6 bowl match-up.
Gatorubet;2059169; said:The Gator Bowl, with tOSU playing Florida, is ranked as the 11th best of the 35 bowl games. From CollegeFootballNews.com.
I think the game is not the most entertaining, and not the most satisfying to watch from a conference rivaly/interest standpoint, but I think the two teams are in fact the two best teams.Coqui;2059218; said:They rank the LSU Alabama game as #1. That invalidates the entire article.
Gatorubet;2059163; said:FYI, reported that Urban and Boom had a less than pleasant phone call about M&M's departure, that resulted in Urban hanging up on him. Don't know if that is true, but several sources are talking about it. I think that Boom might be trying to use the departure of the old Meyer staff as a rallying point for the troops - trying to establish an "us versus them" deal, with Urban and the staff who leave being framed as the bad guys. Not a bad ploy. A "we'll show them! " type thing may be what he needs to focus the team and bring them together - a sort of final catharsis of the Meyer era and move on to his.
Or, just more nonsense to try to hype an otherwise lackluster 6-6 bowl match-up.
Gatorubet;2059163; said:FYI, reported that Urban and Boom had a less than pleasant phone call about M&M's departure, that resulted in Urban hanging up on him. Don't know if that is true, but several sources are talking about it. I think that Boom might be trying to use the departure of the old Meyer staff as a rallying point for the troops - trying to establish an "us versus them" deal, with Urban and the staff who leave being framed as the bad guys. Not a bad ploy. A "we'll show them! " type thing may be what he needs to focus the team and bring them together - a sort of final catharsis of the Meyer era and move on to his.
Or, just more nonsense to try to hype an otherwise lackluster 6-6 bowl match-up.
DaddyBigBucks;2059232; said:Muschamp would be a fool to not use the ploy, and I wouldn't be surprised if the Gators played better than they have all year.
You know what I mean in the context of Urban and Muschamp. Old regime versus new regime. Old ways versus new ways. Old coaches leaving the program - then taking coaches from the program after having an office at UF after leaving and declaring that he could now every see himself coaching anywhere but UF. Boom is no doubt portraying that as disrespect for the current and remaining Gators. He is trying to make this an emotional rivalry game when there is little else out there to get the players up for it.jlb1705;2059237; said:Every football game is "us vs. them" so yeah, this is probably a pretty good idea.
Gatorubet;2059228; said:I think the game is not the most entertaining, and not the most satisfying to watch from a conference rivaly/interest standpoint, but I think the two teams are in fact the two best teams.
I see lots of complaints about the matchup, but almost none that address the fact that the BCS mandate to match the two best teams did not fail. It failed to match the "best game", to be sure, but not the two best teams, IMO. The question of what to do about that is legitimate, if that is what the fans want to see. Beating on the two teams or the SEC for producing them, like some are doing, seems like a misplaced direction given the fact that the BCS was created to pair the two best teams, an entirely different mandate than creating the most interesting game - or a game match up most favored by fans/viewers.
Mrstickball;2058261; said:My predictions for the bowl games:
Oregon 35
Wisconsin 28
Michigan 35
Virginia Tech 24
Georgia 35
Michigan St 21
Nebraska 24
South Carolina 17
Penn State 31
Houston 21
Illinois 28
UCLA 24
Texas A&M 41
Northwestern 28
Oklahoma 41
Iowa 17
Purdue 31
Western Michigan 18
Ohio State 24
Florida 17
Big Ten goes 6-4 in bowls.
Gatorubet;2059169; said:The Gator Bowl, with tOSU playing Florida, is ranked as the 11th best of the 35 bowl games. From CollegeFootballNews.com.
Gatorubet;2059228; said:I think the game is not the most entertaining, and not the most satisfying to watch from a conference rivaly/interest standpoint, but I think the two teams are in fact the two best teams.
I see lots of complaints about the matchup, but almost none that address the fact that the BCS mandate to match the two best teams did not fail. It failed to match the "best game", to be sure, but not the two best teams, IMO. The question of what to do about that is legitimate, if that is what the fans want to see. Beating on the two teams or the SEC for producing them, like some are doing, seems like a misplaced direction given the fact that the BCS was created to pair the two best teams, an entirely different mandate than creating the most interesting game - or a game match up most favored by fans/viewers.
I think I am not making myself clear. Two issues combined, really. First, what I mean is that everyone signed on to a format. The format was settled long before the controversy. Folks that complain about the format - the format that their program (Okie State) signed on to far in advance - have nothing to gripe about concerning the right of Bama to jump them, although they may have a gripe about the process. You can complain about the unfairness of a law and how it should be changed, but that does not mean the law needs to be changed just for you once it has been in place and you agreed to it before you were affected by it.Tlangs;2059256; said:hypothetical question here...lets say Okie State pulls out a double overtime win against Iowa State instead of losing. They would be guarenteed number 2 in the BCS. The fact still remains that they were taken to double overtime by a [Mark May]ty team. Did the BCS work in this scenario by putting the best two teams together (oOSU and LSU) or it did it fail because Bama got left out.