• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Game Thread Game Two: #1 Ohio State 24, #2 Texas 7 (9/9/06)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
I Do ???

jwinslow said:
It's probably b/c you talk in the title, type things like geezee (which rhymes with wheezy), and carry on a conversation almost by yourself.
Click to expand...

geezee I guess I try to have a little fun in here, but now that you have figured me out all i need is a thread where I can talk to myself.

oops Jim you forgot to say something about OSU texas


ty GO BUCKS!! :osu:
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye said:
I can see us cracking 30 points, and if so, Texas is toast. No slam to UT fans, but no way the Longhorns score 30+ points themselves with two totally inexperienced QBs, regardless of surrounding talent.
Click to expand...

See even Mili agrees with me eventually!.
Best buckeye 7/17/06
"
Texas
When was the last time a brand new quarterback in his 2nd game beat the buckeyes??? when was the last time a brand new qb passed for 300 yards against the buckeyes??? When was the last time a brand new qb led his team to a victory over the buckeyes ?? As far as that goes when was the last time a really good qb beat the buckeyes ?? when was the last time a good running baCK BEAT THE buckeyes???? I know the bucks lost last year but you are saying that a brand new qb and running back will beat the buckeyes? ?? sorry i dont see it happening?? lol who does??? "

:oh:
 
Upvote 0
texas

the strain is showing and almost unbearable. Too bad that game doesnt include the Bucks.
I even took my grandson to a fishing tourney today. They had raffle prizes for the kids and what were some of the prizes?? OSU and Mich footballs. go figure

Aug 31, Boston college at Central Mich 6 pm on espn2
:osu:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Then why did you use this as part of your argument:
Click to expand...

That statement had nothing to do with a 50% probability. But rather, the statistics related to something that has already happened is irrelevant to what happens in the future.

For example if the odds of a team going undefeated is 10% a year then the odds of going undefeted in consecutuve years is 1% (0.1 x 0.1). But a team that was undefeated in a previous year that has a 10% chance of going undefeated the following year, has a 10% chance of being undefeated for two straight years.

At this point I am assuming that the persons who don't get these facts never attended a university, at least I hope not.
 
Upvote 0
xrayrandy said:
That statement had nothing to do with a 50% probability. But rather, the statistics related to something that has already happened is irrelevant to what happens in the future.

For example if the odds of a team going undefeated is 10% a year then the odds of going undefeted in consecutuve years is 1% (0.1 x 0.1). But a team that was undefeated in a previous year that has a 10% chance of going undefeated the following year, has a 10% chance of being undefeated for two straight years.

At this point I am assuming that the persons who don't get these facts never attended a university, at least I hope not.
Click to expand...
:roll2:

xrr2ys8.jpg
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top