Do you really think the Fiesta committee is hanging a multi-million dollar decision on how some team Oregon played over 2 months ago is doing tonight?
No.
I think the Fiesta Committee is hanging a multi-million dollar decision on which game the people want to see.
The people want to see OSU v ND. Ohio State is better than Oregon.
If you want to dispute the first point, you'll get the sympathy that a certifiably insane person deserves. If you want to dispute the second point, fine. No one outside of the Pac-10 agrees with you, but fine. I live in Tallahassee, and the people here are hoping for an OSU-VaTech matchup in the Orange Bowl because they want the ACC champion to play the best possible team. When I ask about Oregon, they laugh. (and no, they don't think their Seminoles have a prayer today)
Would Oregon have lost to Texas and PSU if they'd played them? Everyone outside of the Pac-10 believes they would have been destroyed.
So placing importance on the number of losses rewards a team for what, scheduling Houston instead of Texas?
With respect to USC methomps, your opinion is a welcome addition to the board. With respect to Oregon, your arguments are worthless and weak. OSU is the better team, as has been demonstrated over and over. You have not successfully disputed any of the statistical arguments; you simply pull one sentence out of the analysis and quibble over words.
But this is beside the point. OSU is the better draw, and the Fiesta Committee knows it. The ONLY thing Oregon has going for them right now is that OSU has won two of the last three Fiesta Bowls. Oregon should beat that drum for the next 24 hours, because it's their only argument that has garnered any attention at all from the committee. In the end, it won't matter. A third win in four years by the same team might be less interesting to the people of Tempe and the Phoenix metro area, but money is money and the Fiesta will choose with their wallet.
Good morning.