Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
osugrad21;2178469; said:Moved this discussion to the Open Forum.
At this point, its like the $1 throw-a-dart game where you win a Bon Jovi poster or a roach clip feather.
Last year, tOSU fans were in the vat of acid...yeah, I know, child molestation takes it up a notch, blah blah...
But, 99% also defended EVERYTHING at the point...then had a slight separation once JT MAY have messed up...then...well ummm....
Yay for Urban!!
Seriously. Multiple generations were brought up under 'JOEPA'
Smirk, smile...be an asshole. But really...this is a damn shame. The same way JT dumped some of us on our head...I can't imagine this nightmare.
tsteele316;2178507; said:this happy valley bunch doesn't fit that mold.
tsteele316;2178507; said:secondly, the reason that JT did why he did will always be argued. did he do it for altruistic reasons like he claimed (player safety, fbi investigation ect...), or did he do it to try and cash in on a big season in 2010? that's at least an argument that could be had. psu folks certainly don't have that.
osugrad21;2178571; said:The one percent of PSU folks who actually post on a message board...
ORD_Buckeye;2178602; said:I do think the PSU situation runs much deeper than the loony bin over on BWI when you consider that the alumni voted in Lubrano for the board of trustees, the student riots, the Times' interviews with PSU alumni in SC yesterday, the blind support for him by 99.9% of the people at the game following his firing.
Ohio State trustees weren't on BP supporting Tressel. Our students didn't riot when he was fired. Even on a message board centered on the football program, we had a much more vigorous--and often contentious--debate about Tressel, his actions and the appropriate university/ncaa response over issues that weren't a hundredth as severe as what went on at ped aggy.
I guess I understand where you're coming from on one level. On the other hand, I would counter that what's been shown to be the overwhelming mentality of their alumni and fans is reflected on that message board. BWI might be the tip of the crazy spear, but it's a long spear, and what went on throughout that entire university transcends anything that's happened in university history. Long story short, I agree that there are plenty of non kool-aid drinking ped aggy alums, but until they take the narrative back from the crazies, I don't feel hypocritical about painting with a broad brush.
Just my two cents.
The reports findings seem to be a series of assumptions and interpretations of a set of very vague evidence. I can't imagine half of what is in that report would be admissable in court. Read below my one sig comment about the Freeh report. He introduces a fact not supported by evidence into the report. He just slips it in. It is truly unbelievable. I wonder if Freeh will make himself available to answer questions about this report.
Freeh's analysis is just that: Freeh's analysis. It is not evidence; nor does it have any legal power. The more I hear, the more it sounds kinda like an opinion piece. What is most disturbing is the way Freeh's conclusions are being accepted as the final word as to what actually ocurred.
The idea that Joe Paterno would engage in a cover-up is ludicrous. And its easy to hang blame on a dead man. In time, we'll get to Freeh's agenda; but meanwhile, lets not all jump on his band wagon just yet. Lets not take down his statue, or run to be first to proclaim him a devil. There are real trials yet to come, with real evidence to be considered.
ORD_Buckeye;2178602; said:I do think the PSU situation runs much deeper than the loony bin over on BWI when you consider that the alumni voted in Lubrano for the board of trustees, the student riots, the Times' interviews with PSU alumni in SC yesterday, the blind support for him by 99.9% of the people at the game following his firing.
Ohio State trustees weren't on BP supporting Tressel. Our students didn't riot when he was fired. Even on a message board centered on the football program, we had a much more vigorous--and often contentious--debate about Tressel, his actions and the appropriate university/ncaa response over issues that weren't a hundredth as severe as what went on at ped aggy.
I guess I understand where you're coming from on one level. On the other hand, I would counter that what's been shown to be the overwhelming mentality of their alumni and fans is reflected on that message board. BWI might be the tip of the crazy spear, but it's a long spear, and what went on throughout that entire university transcends anything that's happened in university history. Long story short, I agree that there are plenty of non kool-aid drinking ped aggy alums, but until they take the narrative back from the crazies, I don't feel hypocritical about painting with a broad brush.
Just my two cents.
Oh8ch;2179139; said:Not from BWI, but this thread has a lot of potential.
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=157&f=1395&t=9148503