Four kids. That's 1/3 of the roster. From a team that wasn't very good anyway. The starting 5 we bring back still consists primarily of underachievers. I'd probably be less concerned if we were replacing the transfers with a top-level recruiting class. We aren't.
This program isn't stuck in neutral (which, considering we didn't make the tournament, is still unacceptable). It's going in reverse.
If we lost 1/3 of the roster, that never played much to begin with, on a team that "wasn't very good anyway," how is that necessarily a bad thing. The team only lost players that couldn't crack the starting 5 on a bad team. Most coaches wish that the ends of their benches that aren't living up to standards would willingly move on and most of those kids have "discussions" about their future and are "convinced" to move on.
It can be concerning that the staff extended scholarships to these kids and they never lived up to expectations but this staff has also proven that they can recruit players that DO live up to this level of basketball.
Last edited:
Upvote
0