I'm fully behind the head coach. I like him personally and I hope he is wildly succesful.
How he did at the presser depends on who you are. I thought he was robotic, too guarded, and too rehearsed. At least we know the PR people are doing something! He did stay on message and communicate his limited points well.
Perhaps the limited approach was the best, but I wanted him to come out and "our honor defend". He was served up the perfect opportunity by the AP guy, Rusty something or the other, when asked about perception vs. reality and when asked about what changes there would be in making sure the program is complying with NCAA rules. He could have said that he expects every player and coach to conduct themselves in a way that is above reproach, shows respect to the program and univ., and never does anything to tarnish the reputation of either - that he would have zero tolerance for anyone who does. Then he could put the known violations into the context of being abberations in the program, not the standard operating procedure.
Because he didn't really address those things in definite terms, it leaves open the questions as to whether he will do anything different, and that perhaps he can't defend that the program has been clean (known violations not withstanding) because it hasn't been.
I can see where the PR people would want to make sure no harm was done - and they accomplished that - but it terms of beginning to recover the integrity and reputation of the program, no good was done either. And being guarded can be interpreted as hiding something. I would sense that our head coach needs to speak to these issues with specificity, from the heart, with conviction, and with as much transparency as possible.