• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Duke Blue Devils (that rat faced scumbag)

Looks like ESPN can only use one of their favorite terms - "number one Duke" - for a few more days.

That's a shame. :lol:
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1393386; said:
Then you missed the typical bull[censored] refs favoring duke. On the inbounds play where Henderson scores to tie, they took 6 full seconds to inbound the ball. The ref standing near half court was counting with his arm...and you can clearly see him count to 5 and not blow a whistle.

At least there was justice tonight.

Wah-wah... Wake got their make-up call with the travel... Get over it.
 
Upvote 0
I've gotten this response from every Duke fan out there. First, the guy landed on a Wake player and fell. That's a travel.

Second.....just because there was a perceived bad call later, it doesn't change the fact that there was a referee counting to 5 on the in bounds, got to 5, and still didn't blow a whistle. That is exactly why people hate Duke. No other team gets those BS calls every single night.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1393386; said:
Then you missed the typical bullshit refs favoring duke. On the inbounds play where Henderson scores to tie, they took 6 full seconds to inbound the ball. The ref standing near half court was counting with his arm...and you can clearly see him count to 5 and not blow a whistle.

At least there was justice tonight.

I'm not too worried about Duke really going anywhere. They'll look dominant until they need a strong low-post game like they would in the NCAAs. Then they'll flame out against someone like West Virginia or Purdidn't or Minnesota....
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1393600; said:
I've gotten this response from every Duke fan out there. First, the guy landed on a Wake player and fell. That's a travel.

Second.....just because there was a perceived bad call later, it doesn't change the fact that there was a referee counting to 5 on the in bounds, got to 5, and still didn't blow a whistle. That is exactly why people hate Duke. No other team gets those BS calls every single night.

It's only a travel if he tries to get up or rolls over, and he did neither... A player has to be able to land with a rebound... If he can't land, a travel is not supposed to be called unless he tries to roll over or get back up since his feet were never planted to establish a pivot foot...

You always completely lose it about Duke... People like you always look for the conspiracy theories because of your own delusion...
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1393606; said:
So the fact that a referee actually counted to 5 on the in bounds play and didn't blow his whistle isn't a big deal to you? You're that far up duke's ass that it isn't a big deal because you're that used to it?

I'm saying that you want to believe a conspiracy is there, so you find ways to see it...
I personally didn't see it, but, I'm not one to believe that everyone is trying to hand everything to Duke either...
And don't discount the existence of make-up calls... Refs aren't infallible, but they often try to even things out when they can...
 
Upvote 0
blah blah blah...typical duke fan reasoning to duck every legit complaint about BS reffing. this wasn't a charge/block opinion call. this was a referee counting to 5 with hand motions, getting to 5, and then not blowing the whistle. all of this during an inbounds play for duke while duke was down 2 and had no time outs....with seconds remaining.

explain to me how that is excusable.
 
Upvote 0
Just watched the replay on ESPN360 of the last play... Watched it twice. First time I watched I looked at the official. If you count how many times he does it FROM THE WHISTLE, he gets to five and before he's done counting the 5 Duke inbounds...
The second time, I did my own count from the whistle and it was the same. Before I was done counting the 5 it was inbounded...

It has to be a FULL 5 for the call, meaning that he has to finish counting the five or saying 5, which he wasn't... It's not about getting TO 5, it's about counting a complete 5, which he didn't...
 
Upvote 0
I watched it on my 46" HDTV 4 times. I timed it because my cell phone has a stopwatch for some inexplicable reason. I was never under 5 seconds. I also watched the guy counting. He counts with his arm. He pumps his arm 5 times. The first time he pumps it a full second has elapsed. Multiply that by 5 and you get a full 5 seconds. After all that, the ball has still not been inbounded yet.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1393629; said:
I watched it on my 46" HDTV 4 times. I timed it because my cell phone has a stopwatch for some inexplicable reason. I was never under 5 seconds. I also watched the guy counting. He counts with his arm. He pumps his arm 5 times. The first time he pumps it a full second has elapsed. Multiply that by 5 and you get a full 5 seconds. After all that, the ball has still not been inbounded yet.

You need help...

Just stop watching them if you hate them so much...
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top