Fremont Buckeye;2268626; said:That is pretty much irrelevant as drafts vary from year to year as does the NFL position need. That and the draft changed drastically with the rookie salary scale and how teams approach drafting for their team and their current needs.
A sample of years of where DTs were drafted proves little to nothing. If you are preceived to be the best player in the draft or a solid player in the draft you get drafted in high. That is why players get personal evaluations from individuals who talk to NFL teams to see where a particular player projects to go in a draft in a given year. Also remember Coach Meyer has an individual (Coop) in the Woody Hayes Facility that evaluates NFL talent, who may be advising Big Hank on the pros and cons of staying or leaving.
So actual facts prove nothing? Right.
Players are drafted by team need, not by best available. If I had Peyton Manning during his prime and had no solid RBs, I would not pick the top QB but rather the top RB, even if the top QB was the very best player available. You sound like the Browns' draft staff.
Hankins was projected top-5 because he was thought as the best DT and that the top DT would go in the top five picks. That evaluation has apparently slipped. If he is the third or fourth best DT now, you can bet his overall position will take an appropriate plunge. He is likely guaranteed to at least be picked in the late first round, if not higher, depending upon how he does in combines...he may or may not think that is good enough.
Upvote
0