• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Disgraced Former Penn State DC Jerry Sandusky (convicted child molester)

Oh8ch;2168161; said:
Otherwise - he is too much of a coward.

Not only that, but in his sick, twisted mind he hasn't done anything wrong. Either he's completely lost touch with reality, or he's gotten away with it and this has been part of the culture at PSU for so long that he really doesn't understand the difference between right and wrong anymore.
 
Upvote 0
Jerry Sandusky trial: Coaches' testimony raises the question, should men shower with young boys?

For decades, they?ve known him as a man everyone wanted to be.
And it appeared from their faces that they can?t quite grasp, and aren?t yet willing to accept, what their friend and colleague Jerry Sandusky has been charged with doing to young boys.
Two former Penn State assistant coaches took the stand in Sandusky?s defense Monday, both saying they find nothing wrong with men showering with young boys.
Booker T. Brooks, a former receivers and tight ends coach who left Penn State to coach at Oregon State, said he takes showers at the YMCA with his young granddaughter.
Richard ?Dick? Anderson, a former Nittany Lions offensive line coach, said he would consider sharing a hotel room with a young boy if it was for the child?s emotional benefit.
Their testimony elicited ?ahs? from the courtroom gallery. Hushed whispers resonated through the room after the two men acknowledged that they, too, shower with boys, and saw nothing strange about Sandusky doing the same.
They echoed something defense attorney Joe Amendola foreshadowed in his opening statements ? that shared showers are a part of a culture of sports in which Sandusky was immersed.
Perhaps even an acceptance of the generation in which they grew up.
The testimony quickly went viral online, too, with plenty of virtual criticism.
?It?s being discussed a lot more, and I think there?s more vigilance,? Rich Curl, executive director of the Harrisburg-area YMCA, said when asked about the testimony.
At 57, Curl said he has never experienced a shared shower with a coach but said the issue is getting a lot more discussion than it did a few months ago. The Y has implemented family showers in the West Shore facility and looks out for suspicious activity.
?If something seems not appropriate or normal, we would be very sensitive to it,? he said. ?Let?s say if someone was coming in from time to time with different boys, that?s something we would look into.?
Jim Cantafio, head football coach and retired physical-education teacher at Cedar Cliff High School, said he remembers team showers when he was in school.
The 59-year-old Cantafio said coaches would participate occasionally. But group showers were much more of a norm then ? in the 1970s. Now, Cedar Cliff and some other area high schools have replaced open showers with individual stalls, he said.
At that time, no one thought anything of it, he said. But as time has gone on, opinions have changed.
Brad McDermott, a spokesman for the YMCA of the USA, stated in an email that locker-room policies vary on the configuration of a given facility, ?but child safety is always a primary concern.?
?At the Y, the safety and well-being of children in our care has been and always will be a top priority,? McDermott wrote.
He added that many YMCAs have family locker rooms where parents and grandparents can care for children. They have separate changing and showering areas.
A distinction
In testimony Monday, neither of the former football coaches thought it was OK for a man to touch a young boy while naked.
Neither has ever done that in a shower, they said.
Neither had witnessed Sandusky doing that, either, they said.
They both stopped short, when questioned directly and within hypothetical scenarios presented by prosecutor Joe McGettigan, of saying it?s OK for a man to bear-hug, lift or press his body up against a boy while naked.
The distinction is important, because Sandusky has admitted to touching the bare legs of young boys. He has admitted to horsing around in the shower.
Jurors heard that last week when a taped interview of Sandusky?s phone conversation with NBC?s Bob Costas from November was played in court.
McGettigan, on cross-examination of the coaches, also pointed out in his questioning that neither man invited any young boys to shower with them. Their experiences were in groups, not one on one.
Still, they seemed painfully adamant in defending Sandusky?s actions as they know them.
Anderson, Brooks on the stand
They called him great. Well-educated. Organized. Focused. Exemplary. Top-notch.
?I know Jerry extremely well,? Brooks said. ?We would take eight-hour drives, going out scouting. We would scout a future opponent and then eight hours back. You get to know a person.?
Brooks said he?ll reserve his judgment for later.
Anderson, who described Sandusky as a close friend, was called to the stand by Amendola to describe the grueling 15- to 17-hour days that a college football coach works with no time for breaks.

Sandusky?s ?great reputation? meant he was asked to travel even more than usual to camps and to speaking events, Anderson said.
It was common for him to include boys in those football activities, and he saw them on occasion showering together on campus, Anderson said.
It?s something Anderson himself testified he did in the coach?s locker room where so many assaults by Sandusky are alleged to have happened.
?You showered with young boys?? prosecutor McGettigan asked.
?Yes, I still do it,? Anderson answered.
?Eleven-year-olds??
?Yes.?
?Who you didn?t know??
?Yes. There are regularly young boys at the YMCA showering at the same time there are older people showering.?
?Do you hug them in the shower??
Anderson smiled.
?No.?
If necessary ? if there were a need for emotional support ? Anderson said he would have done things that Sandusky did, too, such as share a hotel room with a boy, he testified.
Anderson also acknowledged to McGettigan that Sandusky is very smart and capable of understanding complex issues ? such as why a boy and his mother might have told police in 1998 they were uncomfortable that Sandusky allegedly hugged him naked in a shower.
Sandusky is accused of continuing that behavior for years after he was cleared in the 1998 criminal investigation.
?[Is he] capable of knowing what?s appropriate or inappropriate?? McGettigan asked.
?Yes,? Anderson said.
?If someone told him something was really inappropriate in 1998, do you think he would forget that the next day??
?No.?
?The next year??
?No.?
 
Upvote 0
Jerry Sandusky trial: Mother fills in gaps in son's testimony

She was the last witness for the prosecution, and she might have left a lasting impression.
The mother of the young man known as Victim 9 testified in the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse trial Monday.
Victim 9 alleges he was raped by Sandusky. His mother might have played a key role in supporting her son?s allegations and the prosecution?s case against the former Penn State assistant football coach.
Testifying at times through tears, she sought to help her son in court, even as she said she wished she?d helped him more years ago.
She held her ground on the stand and filled in some blanks in her son?s testimony.
Some observers felt that the 18-year-old Victim 9, who testified last week, did not tell his story as clearly as other witnesses and that his case against Sandusky might have suffered as a result.
When asked why his mother would never have noticed blood in his underpants as the result of the alleged rapes, Victim 9 testified, ?I have a different way of coping with things.?
His mother said that she had noticed no blood because she never saw his underpants.
Her son would tell her that he?d had accidents and threw out his underwear, she testified.
Cataloging some of the gifts her son received from Sandusky, she added, bursting into tears, ?I wish [Sandusky] would have gave him underwear to replace the underwear that I could never find in the laundry.?
She also might have cleared up questions regarding a timeline of allegations.
Victim 9 testified that he had been at Sandusky?s home, usually alone, for sleepovers ?every weekend? during a period running from 2005 through 2008. Another alleged victim ? Victim 1 ? has testified that he spent weekends alone with Sandusky in the former coach?s home.
On Monday, Victim 9?s mother said the visits were two or three weekends a month and stopped after football season ended in the fall.
At first, when Victim 9 made complaints about Jerry being ?touchy, feely,? his mother didn?t pick up the hints of a humiliated child.
She said that she welcomed the attention of a famous figure who gained acclaim for his work with his children?s charity, The Second Mile.
?I thought this was great because he was Jerry Sandusky,? she told lead prosecutor Joe McGettigan. ?He was a very important person. He was in charge of this huge camp.?
She said she appreciated that her son was getting time with Sandusky, since he was alone for large chunks of the day. A single mother, she worked two jobs.
Sometimes, he didn?t want to visit Sandusky, his mother said. When her son started complaining, she conceded, ?I?d just make him go anyways.?
She testified that in retrospect, she feels responsible for what allegedly happened to her son.
She said one night, her son called her late and asked her to pick him up at Sandusky?s house. She never asked ? even to this day ? what happened.
?I just can?t imagine,? she said. ?It?s not that I didn?t want to hear; it?s just that I thought that it would be tough for him to tell me.?
As has been his manner throughout the case, Sandusky showed no reaction to the testimony.
Joe Amendola, Sandusky?s attorney, posed questions implying that the defense will argue Victim 9 might have had other medical issues that could have caused rectal bleeding. But the mother?s testimony was left largely unchecked.
The 68-year-old longtime defensive coordinator for the Penn State football program, Sandusky maintains his innocence. Earlier in the trial, his attorney hinted that jurors would get the chance to hear Sandusky testify.
If so, Sandusky?s testimony will come soon.
Presiding Judge John M. Cleland said it looks like the case could go to jurors this week.
Victim 9's is one of six cases in which Sandusky is charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse ? the most serious of the 51 charges lodged against him. If the jury finds Sandusky guilty of that crime against Victim 9, it could carry a longer prison term than some of the other alleged crimes.
Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse carries a mandatory minimum jail term of 10 years for offenses occurring after 2006. Before then, the minimum jail term was five years. Victim 9?s accusations include alleged crimes occurring after 2006.
The defense launched its case Monday but got off to a stumbling start in part due to witness scheduling issues.

Sandusky?s attorneys asserted there would be a full slate of character witnesses.
Amendola showed Monday he is still trying to pursue the theory that Sandusky?s accusers have colluded on their stories as a prelude to later civil suits against Sandusky, Penn State and The Second Mile.
Amendola issued subpoenas to all private attorneys representing accusers, seeking copies of their fee agreements.
In at least one case, Amendola requested copies of any communications they have had on their clients? cases with the Attorney General?s office or the media.
One of those lawyers, Thomas R. Kline of Philadelphia, said Monday night he was ll weighing how to respond to the request.
 
Upvote 0
Jerry Sandusky trial: Experts cast doubt on histrionic personality disorder defense

The defense in Jerry Sandusky's child sexual abuse trial is suggesting that a personality disorder explains some of the charges against the former Penn State assistant football coach, but one expert says that may be a stretch.
Sandusky's lawyers are arguing that he suffers from histrionic personality disorder. It's defined by the American Psychiatric Association's diagnostic manual as "a pervasive pattern of excessive emotionality and attention seeking" that is "often characterized by inappropriate sexually seductive or provocative behavior" and rapidly shifting emotions.
According to the National Institutes of Health, histrionic personality disorder occurs more often in women than in men.
One expert, however, questions whether it is a separate personality disorder, or just an aspect of broader personality defects.

"It has been removed" from the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, although it may be placed in an appendix for further study, said Dr. Renato Alarcon of the Mayo Clinic. He's part of the personality disorders working group that reviews changes to the manual, known as the "bible" of mental illness. Prosecutors say Sandusky sexually abused boys over a period of years. They say he targeted victims at a charity he founded, groomed them for abuse, and then moved from touching and kissing to more severe forms of sexual abuse, including in some cases oral or anal sex. Sandusky has denied all the allegations.
Sandusky's lawyers, who began presenting their defense Monday, plan to raise the disorder issue to suggest that his extensive correspondence with one of the alleged victims wasn't necessarily "grooming" boys to molest them but instead might be trying to "satisfy the needs of a psyche" with the disorder.
"The jury should not be misled into believing these statements and actions are likely grooming when they are just as likely or more likely histrionic in origin," wrote defense attorney Karl Rominger in the June 11 filing.
But Dr. Glen Gabbard, clinical professor of psychiatry at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said histrionic personality disorder could in no way be seen as a reason or explanation for the abuse of children.


"That diagnosis, if he has it, would be completely irrelevant to anything having to do with criminal responsibility for acts of pedophilia," said Gabbard, an expert on personality disorders. The disorder did figure in one controversial New Jersey murder case. Kristina Burris was convicted of killing her mother in 1992, but the case was overturned on appeal. According to court documents, at one point the defense retained two expert witnesses, who testified that Burris suffered from histrionic personality disorder.
However, they said that diagnosis wasn't relevant to explain her motivations for the killing, but could explain her calm demeanor afterward as a behavior defense mechanism that denies the reality of traumatic events.
 
Upvote 0
LightningRod;2168264; said:
Sandusky's lawyers, who began presenting their defense Monday, plan to raise the disorder issue to suggest that his extensive correspondence with one of the alleged victims wasn't necessarily "grooming" boys to molest them but instead might be trying to "satisfy the needs of a psyche" with the disorder.

Did he ever act inappropriately toward his players or their younger siblings?

Did he ever act inappropriately toward other young boys when there were other people present?

Did any of his former players or other members of the staff ever raise any concerns about their Defensive Coordinator acting strangely, or behaving oddly, like he had some sort of mental disorder?

Did any of the Co-workers at the Second Mile ever see anything to indicate a mental disorder?

No, no, no and no. That sure is a strange mental disorder. Seems like the symptoms only ever showed up when Jerry was alone with another young boy.
 
Upvote 0
VBSJ;2168154; said:
I'd still put money on Sandusky "offing" himself before he serves one day in prison. He seems like the type.

Wishful thinking.
He's delusional. He's got a big ego that won't let him believe he's actually going to prison. And when he goes to prison, he'll get "special" protection from the general population because of his crimes.
He should live a long, long time in prison as some sort of punishment for his crimes.
 
Upvote 0
Taosman;2168289; said:
I have a suspicion that there could be some sort of "network" attached to The Second Mile. That he may have pimped out a couple kids to associates.
We can't take anything for granted with this cover-up.

That has been alluded to months ago in this thread.
 
Upvote 0
Jerry Sandusky trial: Witnesses laud Sandusky as 'wonderful man'; alleged victim called 'dishonest'

Jerry Sandusky's attorneys put character witnesses on the stand this morning, including a woman who described alleged Victim 4 as "a dishonest person who embellished stories."


Megan Rash, 24, who is related to a friend of the accuser, made the comments after questioning by attorney Joe Amendola, who asked about Victim 4's reputation in the community.


Earlier, when Amendola asked Rash about her age, he remarked: "You look about 12." Rash said she was honorably discharged from the military, where she spent time in Iraq. Public records indicate she's in her mid-20s.



Other witnesses included friends and neighbors of Sandusky and adults who knew the former Penn State assistant coach through his children's charity, The Second Mile.


Joyce Porter, mother of 14 kids, said she's known Sandusky for 40 years. "All the people I knew who know Jerry think he's a wonderful man."


Jack Willenbrock, a former Penn State University professor and neighbor of the Sanduskys, described Sandusky was considered a father figure and respected for what he did professionally.


Willenbrock said he would see Sandusky at church with boys. Prosecutor Joe McGettigan asked Willenbrock if he ever knew any of the boys Sandusky was with at church. He replied: "I was probably introduced to them, but there were many over the years."

Sandusky says he's innocent of charges he sexually abused 10 boys. Prosecutors say he met the alleged victims through Second Mile.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top