Was Paterno's reporting to AD Curley an attempt to get to the bottom of the issue, or an attempt to cover it up? This excerpt from the grand jury report (as summarized in the
Black Shoes Diary article) makes me wonder:
Instead of reporting to the real police, Curley brings in the "fixer" (Schultz) and then - ten days later - meets with McQueary without Paterno present, thus keeping Paterno out of the loop. Now Paterno can say that he: (1) fulfilled his reporting requirement by going to Curley; (2) didn't know that Curley and Schultz were going to keep the investigation "in house"; (3) doesn't know what McQueary told Curley and Schultz; and thus (4) doesn't know whether McQueary adequately expressed the seriousness of the situation.
I imagine that Paterno, Curley, and Schultz will try to dump on McQueary - "He said they were 'horsing around'. He never said anything about 'rape'."