• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Desmond Howard (traitor and whiny btch)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Gatorubet;1869681; said:
You forgot the lubricant

sandpile.jpg
Click to expand...

Fact: there is plenty of sand in Desmond's vagina already, Gator.
 
Upvote 0
I think lost in Desmond's tampon-soaking moment is the fact that he actually made a correct assertion...

Matt Simms does indeed suck donkey dick at the QB position, and probably should've went to Morehead St. like the ol' man...
 
Upvote 0
jakenick06;1870250; said:
I think lost in Desmond's tampon-soaking moment is the fact that he actually made a correct assertion...

Matt Simms does indeed suck donkey dick at the QB position, and probably should've went to Morehead St. like the ol' man...
Click to expand...

Yeah, Phil should probably get honorary membership in QBForce or something . . .
 
Upvote 0
I remember seeing something he (Howard) stated that Tressel has been getting away with sh%t since he was at Youngstown State.... Desmond Howard is a pimple on a elephant's ass and just as relevant....
 
Upvote 0
Former Michigan star Desmond Howard is being sued for his Heisman pose.

Brian Masck, the photographer who snapped Howard doing the iconic pose following a 93-yard punt return for touchdown against Ohio State in 1991, is claiming the photo was used without permission and is suing several media sites and entities, including Howard, who have used the photo. Masck brought the suit in January and Howard finally opened up about it last Friday.

Howard uses the photo on his own website, but said he has never profited off it.

In fact, Howard said he and Masck have discussed the photo extensively and Howard even tried to buy the rights. However, the $200,000 price tag was a little too steep.

"It baffles me," Howard told the Detroit Free Press. "It seems absurd that someone can come after you more than two decades after you've played your last down and sue you over your own likeness."

Howard said he plans to 'vigorously fight' the suit. The one thing he does have going for him is that he hasn't profited off the picture, unlike some of the other parties named in the suit. Also, Masck didn't file for a copyright on the picture until 2011 - 20 years after it was shot. And now, 22 years later, he's seeking some sort of compensation from a photo that went viral years before he ever copyrighted it.

.../cont/...
Click to expand...
Leave it to a blogger & the village idiot not to understand copyright law. Masck's ownership of the copyright came into effect the moment he created the photograph. He didn't 'file' for a copyright, he always had the copyright. What he did do was register his (preexisting) copyright with the US Copyright Office.

Now granted his failure to register his copyright sooner will make it harder to obtain recompense but there is absolutely no doubt that ownership of the image has always belonged to him.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top