• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Decanonized Mythologized Disgraced Ped State Monster Coach Joe Paterno (Zombie Icon)

Paternos to conduct review of Freeh report

Joe Paterno's family has instructed its lawyer to form a "group of experts" to conduct a comprehensive review of the facts and conclusions presented in the Freeh report.



Wick Sollers Statement
Following the release of the Grand Jury findings last fall, Joe Paterno called for a thorough, fair and transparent investigation. Like everyone else, Joe was stunned at the charges that were filed against Jerry Sandusky. At the same time, Joe cautioned against a rush to judgment on Penn State and its senior officials and reminded everyone that we owed it to the victims to uncover the full truth.

The announcement of the findings by the Freeh Group is yet another shocking turn of events in this crisis. We are dismayed by, and vehemently disagree with, some of the conclusions and assertions and the process by which they were developed. Mr. Freeh presented his opinions and interpretations as if they were absolute facts. We believe numerous issues in the report, and his commentary, bear further review.

Our interest has been and remains the uncovering of the truth. We have never tried to run from this crisis or shift all responsibility to others. To help prevent this sort of tragedy from happening again at Penn State or any other institution, it is imperative that the full story be told.

After the report was released, we instructed our attorneys and their experts to conduct a comprehensive review of the materials released by the Freeh Group as well as Mr Freeh's presentation and press conference. We have also asked them to go beyond the report and identify additional information that should be analyzed. And we have asked the Freeh Group to preserve all records, notes and other materials related to the investigation and the presentation of their findings as we expect they will be the subject of great interest in the future.

To those who are convinced that the Freeh report is the last word on this matter, that is absolutely not the case. Since various investigations and legal cases are still pending, it is highly likely that additional critical information will emerge. With that said, we want to take this opportunity to reiterate that Joe Paterno did not shield Jerry Sandusky from any investigation or review. The 1998 incident was fully and independently investigated by law enforcement officials. The Freeh report confirms this. It is also a matter of record that Joe Paterno promptly and fully reported the 2001 incident to his superiors. It can certainly be asserted that Joe Paterno could have done more. He acknowledged this himself last fall. But to claim that he knowingly, intentionally protected a pedophile is false.

The process of reviewing the report and other relevant information is going to be a complicated and time consuming exercise. It took the The Freeh Group roughly seven months to conduct more than 400 interviews and review three million documents. We do not expect or intend to duplicate this effort but we are going to be as thorough as reasonably possible. In the meantime, our attorneys have asked that we not make any further comment on this matter until they are ready to provide an update on their progress.

"We are dismayed by, and vehemently disagree with, some of the conclusions and assertions and the process by which they were developed by the Freeh Group," Wick Sollers, the lawyer for the Paterno family, said in a statement Monday. "Mr. Freeh presented his opinions and interpretations as if they were absolute facts. We believe numerous issues in the report, and his commentary, bear further review."




http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_...-lions-paternos-conduct-own-review-freeh-data
 
Upvote 0
Three possibilities come to mind.

  1. They've managed to get most of the old man's money safely into a bank in Zurich, BVI or Bermuda since November.
  2. Good lawyers have advised them that the assets are safe and immunized from the reach of the victims
  3. They have the stupidest lawyers on the [censored]ing planet.

I assume that any source material (not just the final report) will be part of the discovery for any civil trials against the Paterno estate. ScottPa would have fit right in had he won his race for Congress.
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;2179284; said:
ScottPa would have fit right in had he won his race for Congress.
It should be noted that he managed to lose that race despite having the "paterno" surname in pennsylvania. If that's not a stunning indictment on his competency, I don't know what is.


paterno_376.jpg


HERP DERP
 
Upvote 0
Tlangs;2179283; said:
Wick Sollers Statement
Following the release of the Grand Jury findings last fall, Joe Paterno called for a thorough, fair and transparent investigation. Like everyone else, Joe was stunned at the charges that were filed against Jerry Sandusky.

Wow, Wick. It only took you two sentences to start spewing revisionist bullshit lies. Impressive.

Wait a minute. Now that I reread it carefully, it's pretty impressively crafted. It's not the crimes that stunned Blind Eye Joe, it's that charges were actually filed. Fucking brilliant.
 
Upvote 0
If you're Penn State, I don't know how open you want to be with the Paterno review. I actually wouldn't open up anything to them.

Certain information found could be used against a possible (maybe probable) lawsuit against Penn State.

The family will not stop defending him, regardless of how he looks to the rest of the world.
 
Upvote 0
How in the fuck would the family know if Paterno was covering things up?

"Well, Joe didn't come home and tell us that he was both keeping a child rapist out of jail and also giving him the tools and access needed to rape more children....so he must not have been."

It's like all those idiot parents who go to school board meetings when their kids get caught doing drugs in the bathroom. MY son wouldn't do that! Right.....because you would know :roll2:
 
Upvote 0
Bucklion;2179297; said:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...-report-has-attorneys-reviewing-freeh-inquiry

"We disagree" is not good enough, but I guess if they "vehemently disagree", well then...that is the equivalent of FACTS.

Reminds me of that scene in A Few Good Men, where Kevin Pollock owns Demi Moore's character:

"I strenuously object?" Is that how it works? Hm? "Objection." "Overruled." "Oh, no, no, no. No, I STRENUOUSLY object." "Oh. Well, if you strenuously object then I should take some time to reconsider."

You VEHEMENTLY disagree? Oh, well, in that case......
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top