• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Cotton Bowl: Ole Miss 47, Texas Tech 34 (Final)

Sportsbuck28;1369372; said:
I don't consider it a gimmick offense in the slightest. All I see is Mike Leacah doing an excellent job of attempting to get the ball to his playmakers in space, spreading the field with all of the WR's as well as confusing the defense with the different variations in routes. Thats just putting your team in the best position to win, good coaching.

The lopsided talent difference between the O and the D really doesn't factor into it being gimmicky, just means that they don't recruit well on the defensive side of the ball.

I guess you can pretty much label any spread offense or any offense that doesn't run the power I, or any team that doesn't play defense well as a gimmicky offense under those terms.

in 1968 the power I was a gimmick.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1369377; said:
How many Tech QB's are getting it done in the NFL? What's that? None? Like I said... Gimmick.

I don't disagree about it "working" and being "good coaching" but, that's not evidence it's a gimmick. How does a team with a talent gap compete? Gimmick, that's how.

No... the triple option is a gimmick too....

Pretty much works like this - Does it work in the NFL? Yes? Not a gimmick. No? Gimmick.

two responses:

the Patriots and Saints both run spread a passing offense.

or

is the wildcat formation a gimmick?
 
Upvote 0
lvbuckeye;1369497; said:
two responses:

the Patriots and Saints both run spread a passing offense.
Better go draft Harrell then.

New England has the #6 rushing offense in the NFL (12th in passing)
You make a better point with New Orleans (28th) which is completely one dimensional (1st in passing)

and of course, both clubs missed the playoffs....
or

is the wildcat formation a gimmick?
Yes. It's essentially a trick play in the NFL.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1369504; said:
Better go draft Harrell then.

New England has the #6 rushing offense in the NFL (12th in passing)

yeah, and Tom Brady didn't pass for 50 TDs last year or anything.

You make a better point with New Orleans (28th) which is completely one dimensional (1st in passing)
as if losing Deuce and Reggie to injury wouldn't have an impact on the run-pass ratio...

and of course, both clubs missed the playoffs....
yeah, and losing key players to injury didn't have anything to do with that...

Yes. It's essentially a trick play in the NFL.
i suggest you reread what you wrote: Pretty much works like this - Does it work in the NFL? Yes? Not a gimmick. No? Gimmick.

the wildcat works in the NFL. one team used it last year. several teams used it this year, obviously because it worked for that one team last year.. therefore by your own definition, the wildcat is not a gimmick. see what i did there?
 
Upvote 0
lvbuckeye;1369522; said:
the wildcat works in the NFL. one team used it last year. several teams used it this year, obviously because it worked for that one team last year.. therefore by your own definition, the wildcat is not a gimmick. see what i did there?
Yes, LV, I see what you did there... find the exception to the rule, argue it as if it has special force.... it's what you do.
 
Upvote 0
the wildcat works in the NFL. one team used it last year. several teams used it this year, obviously because it worked for that one team last year.. therefore by your own definition, the wildcat is not a gimmick. see what i did there?
How many teams are running it effectively?

Seems more likely that Ronnie Brown & Ricky Williams work effectively. Not many teams with those two on roster.
 
Upvote 0
Rut roh.... NFL.com reveals that New England had a running game in 2007 as well (13th)... True enough, they were #1 in passing though. Some might say they were going for... wait for it..

wait...

wait...

Balance.

PS - there's more... in terms of Attempts, NE was 9th in the NFL in rushing attempts... 5th in passing attempts.... again I say....

Balance.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1369524; said:
Yes, LV, I see what you did there... find the exception to the rule, argue it as if it has special force.... it's what you do.

hey, all i did was ask a question based on your criteria. sorry for busting your chops.
i'm the bad guy for catching you making sweeping generalizations.
 
Upvote 0
lvbuckeye;1369535; said:
hey, all i did was ask a question based on your criteria. sorry for busting your chops.
i'm the bad guy for catching you making sweeping generalizations.

Uh huh.... It was my mistake for not making certain that my back and forth with sportsbuck28 was worded completely and totally air tight. It's the internet after all, and unlike common conversations, we should be careful not to use words in a manner which people might understand as "ordinary" conversation....

Incidentally..... You've yet to establish that the TTU style O works in the NFL... and I haven't even given the obvious caveat "consistently" yet.

Jwins seems to understand the caveat even unspoken....to his credit, though, he seems familiar with casual conversation.
 
Upvote 0
it'll sound like a copout, but it depends who's running it and who's defending it. the 'Fins were the only team to run it in '07. but several other teams ran it in '08. doesn't sound like a gimmick to me; it sounds like a trend.

i saw a lot of stuff in the NFL this year that could be classified as a gimmick, but damn near everything we take for granted as "traditional" was a gimmick in its inception. anything different is a gimmick until everyone else starts doing it too.

the Ravens were running an unbalanced line this year with and extra OT lined up at TE and pulling the opposite guard. is that a gimmick? well, Tressel used that formation with considerable success in The Game three years ago.

Carolina was running flex bone look with two fullbacks. is that a gimmick? i don't think so. the flexbone has been around for more years than i've been alive.
 
Upvote 0
I don't disagree that everything was a gimmick at its inception....

there's a difference between schemes and plays and formations though. You don't see a triple option in the NFL.... it's a gimmick.

That word "gimmick" doesn't mean it can't be successful, or that it is without value, or even that a "traditional" team should wholly avoid it at all costs. I'm speaking more generally....
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top