I don't know that. But most people who lose their jobs don't commit suicide. Much like the virus for many who "die from it", losing his job might well have been the straw that broke an already weakened camel's back, in which case it may be as reasonable to attributable the suicide to that as it is to attribute the death of someone with comorbidities to the virus (albeit the former requires a bit more of a leap to make the connection). I'm just pointing out that preexisting biases lean people to weight confounding variables differently in the two cases.
Also the friend losing his job might, or might not, have been a result of government action. Many people were, to a degree at least, going to be hunkering down without stay at home orders. Does the guy still get to rage at the "faux high-ground" people if the friend lost his job just because those people limited their patronage of his employer's business of their own volition in accordance with their own risk tolerance? I also think that there are businesses (especially the big publicly held multinationals) that are or will, with government ramping up unemployment compensation, use "the government shutdown" as an excuse to trim some employee fat from their payrolls, automate more, etc.