Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All I know is that if this was a bio-terrorist attack instead, the general population (not saying you in particular) would be doing everything gov asked and more with no questions attached. This doesn't happen as quickly though, so it's hard for people to take seriously until they see 10,000 dead overnight.
Yeah, because he admitted he was wrong!!a few days ago: "that epidemiologist was wrong; we can't trust him."
today: "that epidemiologist is right; we can trust him."
So everyone is locking down and now less people will die...isn’t that...what we want?
Found out today that my next door neighbor had it in January while conventioning in Vegas. Taking no chances, I had to set their house on fire today.
i told you fuckers 100 pages ago that it ripped through Vegas in January.
guess what? WE'RE ALL STILL HERE!
So, just so I understand your position, regarding the antibody test...virtually 100% of people should test positive then, right?it's a false notion. virtually every single person on Earth has already been exposed to it.
they say 1 person infects three others, right? (1+3)^28 = 5,785,028,257,166.
THAT WAS ON DAY 28.
we're past day 90. 4.88161318^39. MORE PEOPLE THAN THERE ARE ATOMS IN THE ENTIRE SOLAR SYSTEM.
edit: fixed math.
1st bolded part: A purposeful biological attack and a naturally (as we know so far) occuring virus aren't even in the same solar system.All I know is that if this was a bio-terrorist attack instead, the general population (not saying you in particular) would be doing everything gov asked and more with no questions attached. This doesn't happen as quickly though, so it's hard for people to take seriously until they see 10,000 dead overnight.
I assume you had the flu before. If you don't currently have it, would you still test positive because you had it before and got over it?So, just so I understand your position, regarding the antibody test...virtually 100% of people should test positive then, right?
In an antibody test? Yes you would.I assume you had the flu before. If you don't currently have it, would you still test positive because you had it before and got over it?
But you didn’t answer the question. Should ~100% of people test positive for exposure in an antibody test? Because there is a county in Colorado who is attempting to test everyone in the county right now.i just did the math.