• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is too exciting for adults to discuss (CLOSED)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sad.

That said, one with known ‘significant’ other issues. One example contains no information regarding preexisting conditions. Two other examples are not deaths.

Sure, you can onesie / twosie this all day long, @MililaniBuckeye post is still valid. There’s no significant signals that this is killing younger people. Those who are dying had one step in the direction of the cemetery anyhow.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Children aren't dying from this, Peyote Boy...
Not yet but it's going to happen dipshit. An as my post said grandma and grandpa and other families will die. Parents will die, loved ones will die. Why are you trying to defend the lack of response?

COVID-19 appears on average to be much milder in children than it does in healthy adults or in older adults. Of the first 70,000 patients in China diagnosed with COVID-19, only 2.1 percent were children under 19 years old. No children under the age of 9 died according to this report. Only one death was reported in a child 10-19 years.https://intermountainhealthcare.org...3/covid-19-and-children-what-you-should-know/
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I was about to address these, but @sparcboxbuck took care of it. You found four isolated examples out of 375,000 known cases world-wide. Currently, not a single child under the age of 10 has died from this, on the entire fucking planet...not one.

View attachment 25051

I haven't read the full thread so apologies if this is already posted. The other things to consider when thinking of the seriousness of COVID 19 are the hospitalization rate and how that affects the entire healthcare system.

A limiting factor in all of this is the number of hospital beds and equipment (e.g., ventilators) in the US. If everyone gets sick within a short time frame, the number of hospitalizations will be greater than hospital capacity and more people than necessary will die. Per the CDC, of the patients who are hospitalized, 20% are aged 20-44 years. Even though younger people don't die from COVID 19, they are hospitalized at a pretty high rate and, if so, would be taking up resources at the hospital. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6912e2.htm This is is a quick article summarizing the hospital capacity gap but the conclusion in the article seems pretty clear: "We are at an inflection point and clearly do not have the capacity to care for our population of COVID-19 patients if the infections occur quickly and there is a spike in acutely ill patients. However, spreading the disease out, and providing new strategies to expand the number of beds and the workforce, can help ensure that we get through this difficult period." https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200317.457910/full/

Watch this video. This is a hospital in Italy. Note that it looks like some of the best modern hospitals we have here in the US. And note that there are patients EVERYWHERE, in hallways, waiting rooms, etc. Even if most of those people survive, this is what we're trying to avoid in the US.

Also, hospitals and staff still need to treat other illnesses. If the hospitals are full of COVID 19 patients, even young ones who are likely to survive, they do not have as much capacity to treat any other illnesses or injuries that happen in every day life, e.g., people who may have cancer or heart disease or may have been injured in a car accident. The person who dies from cancer because there is no room in the hospital may not be counted as a COVID 19 fatality, but would be directly related to the pandemic and should be considered when figuring out how serious this all is.

Finally, a young person may not die from COVID 19 but may require ventilation. There are a limited number of ventilators in the US and if there are too many serious cases, doctors will need to choose who gets treatment, which may be condemning someone else to die who may have had a better chance at survival. Article on this subject: https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...s-need-ventilators-and-just-one-is-available/
 
Upvote 0
90559651_10222172894015653_8760536525562707968_n.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Not yet but it's going to happen dipshit.
And your pakalolo-infused brain knows this how? If it hasn't killed a single kid under age 10 in the three (known) months and 375,000 cases around the globe it's been around, it sure the fuck ain't going to start now, especially with all the precautions everyone is taking. JFC, your paranoia knows no bounds.

An as my post said grandma and grandpa and other families will die. Parents will die, loved ones will die.
The elderly die every fucking day. And name an instance where an entire family has died from this.

Why are you trying to defend the lack of response?
What "lack of response" am I defending. Trump shuts off travel from China--you know, where this shit fuckin originated from--the Dems label him a racist xenophobe. And now Dems shoot down the $1T aid package...fuck them.
 
Upvote 0
I haven't read the full thread so apologies if this is already posted. The other things to consider when thinking of the seriousness of COVID 19 are the hospitalization rate and how that affects the entire healthcare system.

A limiting factor in all of this is the number of hospital beds and equipment (e.g., ventilators) in the US. If everyone gets sick within a short time frame, the number of hospitalizations will be greater than hospital capacity and more people than necessary will die. Per the CDC, of the patients who are hospitalized, 20% are aged 20-44 years. Even though younger people don't die from COVID 19, they are hospitalized at a pretty high rate and, if so, would be taking up resources at the hospital. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6912e2.htm This is is a quick article summarizing the hospital capacity gap but the conclusion in the article seems pretty clear: "We are at an inflection point and clearly do not have the capacity to care for our population of COVID-19 patients if the infections occur quickly and there is a spike in acutely ill patients. However, spreading the disease out, and providing new strategies to expand the number of beds and the workforce, can help ensure that we get through this difficult period." https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200317.457910/full/

Watch this video. This is a hospital in Italy. Note that it looks like some of the best modern hospitals we have here in the US. And note that there are patients EVERYWHERE, in hallways, waiting rooms, etc. Even if most of those people survive, this is what we're trying to avoid in the US.

Also, hospitals and staff still need to treat other illnesses. If the hospitals are full of COVID 19 patients, even young ones who are likely to survive, they do not have as much capacity to treat any other illnesses or injuries that happen in every day life, e.g., people who may have cancer or heart disease or may have been injured in a car accident. The person who dies from cancer because there is no room in the hospital may not be counted as a COVID 19 fatality, but would be directly related to the pandemic and should be considered when figuring out how serious this all is.

Finally, a young person may not die from COVID 19 but may require ventilation. There are a limited number of ventilators in the US and if there are too many serious cases, doctors will need to choose who gets treatment, which may be condemning someone else to die who may have had a better chance at survival. Article on this subject: https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...s-need-ventilators-and-just-one-is-available/

Italy is a fairly unique situation, in that:
1) They had over 100,000 people from Wuhan come over to one of the towns hardest hit less than two years ago...essentially Italy's Ground Zero
2) The have the highest percentage of elderly--and most vulnerable--population in Europe, with over 22% of its people being 65 or older
3) While other countries shut down their borders, Italy did not immediately do so
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top