BigWoof31;2171872; said:
Stop with this - you know what he means. He doesn't want the game played in rain, he wants in played in snow, snow and more snow. There are volumes of threads about B1G teams being constructed for just that fact and thats why Domes should be eliminated.
If its not a complaint about travel to the game site being longer, its a complaint about throwing a ball in inclimate weather.
If you refuse to bring anything but hyperbolic sound bites because they're easier than actual debate, then I'm done with this.
Nutri said what many anti-northern bowl arguments claim, that playing up north would be bogged down by snow.
Cinci responded that the best aerial assault in pro football does just fine in Green Bay, and then pointed out that big bowls/NFL games are often played in southern monsoons, and asked why that was better.
Nowhere did he claim that:
- warm weather should be outlawed
- rainy weather should be avoided
- only snow is the goal
Yet you laughably claimed all three.
It's pretty freaking simple, Woof. The B1G has played virtual road games for the last century when it comes to bowl games.
We'd like to play one freaking major bowl game in our region. Just one. Is that such an unfair request?
And yes, we'd like it to be outside, not in a weatherless dome, even if that means the wimpy fans (northern & southern alike) have to put on a freaking hat and coat.
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Chicago, Green Bay, New York have all managed the snow for years with plenty of classic postseason games. Great quarterbacks have risen to the challenges of cold, snow, humid monsoons and the rest. Others have crumbled.
The ACC, Big Least, PAC 12, SEC, and Big XII all do.
what a joke