Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Apache;1901956; said:Playoffs in Football
Ok Here is a "half-baked" way to do this without adding too much to the year.
Every conference has divisions with 8 teams. 7 Games played
Conference championships. 1 game played
16 Teams make playoffs 5 games to the Championship
Total= 13 games
-------------------------------------------------
Or we could leave it the way it is a lot of folks have something to grouse about.
buckeyegrad;1902027; said:Don't get me wrong, I support a playoff system; and I actually like your idea to a certain degree, just the numbers as you presented them would never work.
Personally, my ideal for college football would be even more crazy and unlikely: go to four mega-conferences of 20 teams each and dump the bottom-feeders from the MAC, WAC, Sunbelt, etc. Each conference would be two divisions of 10 teams and you play everyone in your division (9 games). Plus, you get 3 games out of division, but you can only schedule other mega-conference schools--no bottom-feeders. This system would pretty much guarantee a school at least 5 home games a year, and it could be as high as 7 or 8.
You have your conference championships and the four winners go into a playoff. All other teams at .500 go to bowl games as in the current system, but again, without the bottom-feeders. Yes, to win the championship, you would have to play 15 games, but that would only be 2 schools. The overwhelming majority of programs would still only play 12-13 games. Oh, and did I mention, I don't want any bottom-feeders!
I think a "not so fast my friend" is appropriate here... It ain't over by a long shot with Auburn.jwinslow;1902264; said:They have always been laughable hypocritical and now all of a sudden they are cracking down on pro agents, street agents, memorabilia sales, but more importantly the cash cows are no longer getting slaps on the wrist when they get caught. Admittedly, Auburn was the exception to the rule.
Definitely, but they went against their newfound ethics when instantly reinstating him when at least a week off was justified just for the attempt at cheating alone, let alone the volume or evidence everyone knew they would find within months, if they didn't have it already.Gatorubet;1902304; said:I think a "not so fast my friend" is appropriate here... It ain't over by a long shot with Auburn.
Saw31;1900025; said:So an NCAA playoff produces "the best team" to claim a Nat'l Championship eh? That regular season sure means a lot now, don't it...
aka the end of our team's football seasonJake;1902337; said:The post that brought this thread back from the dead after almost 3 months
aka the end of our team's basketball season, and the return to football talk until november.no doubt a reaction to top seed Ohio State losing in the sweet 16 of the tournament.
nor would yours, unless you took an entire week to make thus conclusionIf the Buckeyes were an 8 seed playing in the Final Four tonight this post would've never been made, and this thread would still be sleeping.
But I'm glad you're here to educate us on why we think and do the things we doSay it ain't so.
Jake;1902337; said:The post that brought this thread back from the dead after almost 3 months, no doubt a reaction to top seed Ohio State losing in the sweet 16 of the tournament.
If the Buckeyes were an 8 seed playing in the Final Four tonight this post would've never been made, and this thread would still be sleeping. Say it ain't so.
This statement is not your finest post Josh. Neither Cam or Tress get penalized for what anyone thinks might be found in the future. Everyone can engage in reasonable speculation about it - that is the discussion part of a board. But seriously!! - complaining because the NCAA or the institution failed to act on what might be found? That's bat certifiable [Mark May]! :crazy: Tress does not get punished for haters hatin' and speculating, and Newton does not get punished for haters hatin' and speculating - at least not because Cam's dad offered (and was denied and turned in by) Mississippi State - unless you have proof of illegal benefits paid Cam or his dad by Auburn.jwinslow;1902322; said:when at least a week off was justified just for the attempt at cheating alone, let alone the volume or evidence everyone knew they would find within months, if they didn't have it already.*
Seriously? You're painting the NCAA into a black and white set of absolutes, Ye who loves the gray?Gatorubet;1902467; said:This statement is not your finest post Josh. Neither Cam or Tress get penalized for what anyone thinks might be found in the future. Everyone can engage in reasonable speculation about it - that is the discussion part of a board. But seriously!! - complaining because the NCAA or the institution failed to act on what might be found? That's bat certifiable [Mark May]! :crazy: Tress does not get punished for haters hatin' and speculating, and Newton does not get punished for haters hatin' and speculating - at least not because Cam's dad offered (and was denied and turned in by) Mississippi State - unless you have proof of illegal benefits paid Cam or his dad by Auburn.
Time will tell. I'm betting they get hammered.
*And the "if they didn't have it already" does not change anything - they either have proof or they do not - at this time.
exactly, which will only add to the insanity of this madness if they decide to come down harder on Tressel. Not that he deserves a pass, but there is no saving face here for them.SmoovP;1902501; said:Tat5. Sugar Bowl.
SmoovP;1902501; said:Tat5. Sugar Bowl.