Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When your program knows no bottom.
It's not like employers have the bigger dog in the health insurance hunt and therefore have a vested interest in how well their employees take care of themselves. Wait.. I guess it is exactly like that.That's generally how every single job I have ever held works.
Considering my post above, good point about not being at will, in this case. I was talking more "at large" Having not seen his contract, I would be surprised if there wasn't some clause that addresses his well being in some way. Maybe not on all fours, leading to your suspected lawsuit... and I think he files a suit regardless.I suspect Rolovich will file a lawsuit. His case may be different than the one the Supreme Court decided because his employment was governed by a specific contract. He was not an at-will employee like most.Employment contracts typically define what qualifies as cause. That is what the fight will be over.
Let’s not discuss the Rolovich case in this thread.
I don't know what his contract says, but I trust they did not fire a 7 figure employee without consulting a lawyer first.
I don't know what his contract says, but I trust they did not fire a 7 figure employee without consulting a lawyer first.
There have been a number of court cases that have all supported the right of employers to require employees to be vaccinated. Your larger point, though, is correct: companies' right to compel behaviors is quite limited.So you think a company can force you to do whatever they want you to do or fire you? Uh, no...
Seriously, just move the Rolovich posts to the Washington State thread and ignore them if you're not interested and it doesn't get overly political.
This actually is a football story, it's going to keep coming up on the football board.