Mac;2332984; said:Give him a shot at QB...why not? Can't be any worse than Weeden from last year
Please tell me this is a joke.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Mac;2332984; said:Give him a shot at QB...why not? Can't be any worse than Weeden from last year
Mac;2332984; said:Give him a shot at QB...why not? Can't be any worse than Weeden from last year
y0yoyoin;2332995; said:tebow in chuds offense would be a complete disaster...i think washington should give him a look...i think he may be able to pull off some success in a Shanahanigans offense
jlb1705;2332574; said:That's what makes the last two rounds such a joke. It's not as if there's nobody left out there that might be better than the 53rd best guy on the Browns' roster. Even the Ravens, 49ers, Ravens and Broncos are finding areas where they can improve, but the Browns look at their roster and see none apparently.
AKAK;2332997; said:Well, and this may not describe you, so forgive me if that's the case, but, I think there is/was some concern that the new regime such as it is, was going to come in and eviscerate the roster of a team that was more or less headed in the right direction... now, obviously you're correct that there are current needs, TE comes to mind, but, I think there's a sense that thsi team has a number of pretty good players that they aren't sure about yet, so, why spend a lot of draft picks to displace guys that you might like, when next year you're gonna have a much better sense of what the real needs are. (and will have better picks to use on them or as assets for other moves)
Further, the roster is reasonably young, so its not as though you have a bunch of second stringers that are long in the tooth and need to be replaced.
Bucklion;2333001; said:Well, they certainly didn't...do...that. In fact, quite the opposite. That punt job on this year's draft kind of indicates they are looking at 2014, and will use this year as somewhat of an open tryout to see who fits and who doesn't.
AKAK;2333006; said:Well, it may be (I don't mean to give them too much credit, but, it was an active plan, not a passive one, so SOMETHING had to be the strategy) sort of the same thing - other than not liking any of them much - as not using a high pick on a QB, where, since they didn't like any of them much, you're just changing to make a change, and well, you have a new coaching staff, etc, so why do that? Its not as though the old plan was stale and outlived, you got rid of Shurmur, etc. So why replace a bunch of guys you're not sure need to be replaced?
At any rate, if you like the idea of better selections next year, add Josh Gordon to this class and think that Slaughter will rebound from his injury, and assume McFadden is at least an upgrade/younger guy on the outside at CB... maybe its not too bad. The 7th round guys will end up being what they are, but hey, they're 7th rounders.
Bucklion;2333017; said:Pluto said in the PD that they were likely amassing picks in case they need to trade up for a QB next year. While there may be some truth to that, Bellichik has always amassed picks in NE, rarely trading up (but doing so once in a while for a specific guy) so I imagine it is more the tree than for a QB.
exhawg;2332996; said:He would probably be a good backup anyplace where the starter runs the read option. Just not someplace where the goal for the QB is to get the ball down the field.
Weeden is a much better fit for this offense than he was for Shurmur's. I think the Browns will probably look to take a QB in the draft next year, but it will depend on how well Weeden plays to determine what round that QB gets drafted in. If Weeden sucks the Browns will be taking a first round QB. If he makes a good improvement and the Browns end up 8-8 or better they'll probably look for a project in a later round knowing that Weeden should be the starter for at least the next few years.
AKAK;2333022; said:Well, we do need a tight end. (or more to the point an H-Back, or F-back or whatever Norv calls them).
(I'm not up for the side show but, if he gets over this QB crap, he might be abel to do something)
I think he was referring to Tebow coming in and filling that role.That's why I really wanted them to go after Boren. Gronkowski's brother looked good in the preseason last year so I wouldn't be surprised to see him make the team this year with Watson and Smith gone. I'm not overly worried about TE.
LitlBuck;2333059; said:I think he was referring to Tebow coming in and filling that role.
It is sort of surprising that the Browns did not take any tight ends considering that Turner loves to use them in his offense.