His base salary for 2023 and 2024 was not guaranteed. The alternative to re-negotiating was probably being released.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Any insight on why he played so few snaps? Was it injury or something else? He's exciting as a prospect and we should have a year for him to develop if he needs it, but I shared the announcers concerns on not playing much.
However, sources told Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio that, along with Raiders' owner Mark Davis, the owner who voted "no" was likely Cincinnati Bengals owner Mike Brown.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bengals-owner-may-rejected-rams-175306964.htmlBrown has a well-documented reputation for refusing to go along with anything that helps the league become bigger and better. His primary concern in those situations is the impact of the new revenue on the salary cap.
So Brown prefers the status quo, especially when the status quo doesn’t require him to spend more money on players.
Not that Brown deserves defending, as he does have a ton of flaws, but that story was pretty roundly debunked. It was pretty much a shitty speculation piece at best anyway. The source didn't say they knew it was Brown even, just that it seemed like something they thought Brown might do.Mike Brown might be a lovely person. I HATE him as an owner.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bengals-owner-may-rejected-rams-175306964.html
Unless they plan on moving him to DB, that doesn't make much sense.So there's a few mocks out there that have Bengals taking Braxton in the first rd...
I can only get so erect
Agree on Jones, but absolutely not on Sanu. He brings so many different looks on offense.Bengals could lose Marvin Jones and/or Sanu
Have Green, Eifert, Sanu etc.Bengals could lose Marvin Jones and/or Sanu