because winning the games that have already been played should carry more weight than any hypothetical maybes going forward.why? they are clearly not the same team as with Jordan Travis who was in the Heisman discussion ...
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
because winning the games that have already been played should carry more weight than any hypothetical maybes going forward.why? they are clearly not the same team as with Jordan Travis who was in the Heisman discussion ...
Sport is truly fucked if Free Shoes U gets left out
The 5th bullet point comes into play when there is a serious problem concerning the closeness of the teams involved...in this case, there's not. FSU won all the games they played, regardless of whether they played with their first-string, second-strong, or third-string QB...Texas and Alabama didn't. And the only reason Alabama is in there is the 31-yard end-of-game TD pass they pulled out of the ass against six-loss Auburn.Curious since the ‘criteria’ they listed on the 5th bullet point was ‘unavailability of key players’
Sugar Bowl is a semi. Dawgs will probably play FSU in the Orange. We're probably bound for the Cotton or Fiesta. I predict Cotton vs Oregon or Oklahoma.So .... Bucks to the Cotton Bowl and Dawgs to the Sugar Bowl?
Yes I meant Orange BowlSugar Bowl is a semi. Dawgs will probably play FSU in the Orange. We're probably bound for the Cotton or Fiesta. I predict Cotton vs Oregon or Oklahoma.
It’s unreal. Go beat TTUN.Saban is gonna win the Natty with his worst team in 15 years lol