Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Tonyank;1863028; said:This thread rivals the Indians thread in complete failures.... Not sure which is worst :/
Hardly. Everybody knows, and has known, the Tribe sucks balls.Tonyank;1863028; said:This thread rivals the Indians thread in complete failures.... Not sure which is worst :/
The NBA does something strange: They consider Cleveland?s 24-game losing streak in 1982 to be the all-time record, even though the thing was accomplished over two seasons. That year, the Cavaliers lost their last 19 games of the 1981-82 season, and their first five of the 1982-83 season.
Don?t get me wrong ? that was a spectacular streak and a spectacular wreck of a team. What makes the streak even better is that the Cavaliers broke the streak against a terrible Golden State Warriors team at home, but they needed overtime to do it. And they promptly lost seven more in a row, which means that the Cavs were a Warriors regulation shot away from losing 32 in a row. I was a big Cavaliers fan at the time, and I remember just how bad those teams were. People called them the Cadavers, and rarely has any insulting nickname fit better. But it wasn?t their awfulness that made them stand out. It was their purpose. They seemed determined to rid themselves of any player that showed even the vaguest spark of talent.
The 1981-82 team had Bill Laimbeer, Mike Mitchell, Scott Wedman and James Edwards. That is not great, admittedly. But maybe with those four, a bunch of role players (something the Cavaliers did not lack ? 23 different players wore a Cavs uniform that season) and some intensity, you could at least make things respectable. Those Cavaliers were the arch-enemy of respectability, of course, and so they traded away all four within two years. It was that systematic purging of anything resembling aptitude that made that team, in my opinion, unique in NBA history. Mike Mitchell was my favorite player at the time, for lack of options. He was a turnover machine, which was a special feat because he almost never passed the ball. His defense was often purely theoretical. But he could put the ball in the basket. This was too much for Cleveland. He was traded before the streak began for Ron Brewer, Reggie Johnson and cash. Especially, cash.
Bill Laimbeer ? by far the best player on the team, though to be fair the Cavaliers seemed hopelessly unaware of it at the time ? was traded for Phil Hubbard, Paul Mokeski and first- and second-round draft picks. With those picks, and I swear this is true, the Cavaliers took John Bagley and Dave Magley. Yes. Bagley and Magley. It?s like Dr. Seuss was running the organization.
Even so, even as gloriously bad as the those Cavaliers teams were, I don?t think you should count a losing streak over two seasons. A two-year losing streak is an oddity, might make for an interesting bar bet, but it?s not continuous. To me the longest losing streak in NBA history is 23 games, and for the next few days it will be held by the expansion 1995-96 Vancouver Grizzlies and the 1997-98 Denver Nuggets.
Cont..
WolverineMike;1868103; said:certainly they can beat the Grizzlies......right? I don't want to see this happen to Scott. I've always liked him as a coach.